Milwaukee Bucks

Also known as Wyman Diagrams. Created by @taylormetrics on TikTok, where they became a viral trend.

Size value over replacementOutlinePlugs in anywhereHardest to fitColourBalancedPerimeter shooterOn-ball creatorInterior bigDisruptor / connectorWhite what a perfect team would add
Michael Redd: The roster bends round himReddAndrew Bogut: Average fitBogutBobby Simmons: Hardest to fitSimmonsMo Williams: The roster bends round himWilliamsMichael Ruffin: Average fitRuffinDesmond Mason: Average fitMasonDan Gadzuric: Hardest to fitGadzuricRamon Sessions: Average fitSessionsCharlie Villanueva: Hardest to fitVillanuevaJake Voskuhl: Average fitVoskuhlRoyal Ivey: Hardest to fitIveyBELOW REPLACEMENT · NOT IN THE BOX · SAME SCALECharlie Bell: Hardest to fitBellAwvee Storey: Hardest to fitStoreyYi Jianlian: Hardest to fitJianlian

Season by season

2000-012026-27

5%

of the box filled, 28 of 30. 11 players in the box, worth 6.5 per 100 above replacement.

−1.1

team fit, points per 100 its lineups are predicted to gain or lose by playing together (O −0.7, D −0.3). An estimate.

What fills the box

Share of the box by kind of player. The tick is the average of the season’s five fullest rosters.

Balanced1%
Perimeter shooter0%
On-ball creator3%
Interior big1%
Disruptor / connector0%
PlayerMPGDPMBox

This version uses Taylormetrics’ Wyman Diagram and Justin Liu’s model and packer. Size is DPM above a −2.0 replacement level to the power 2.2, times minutes per game. Outlines are an estimate: they predict the hand-drawn originals only weakly, so read them as a lean, not a stat. Playoff-adjusted moves each player by his career playoff offense change and playability.