Milwaukee Bucks

Also known as Wyman Diagrams. Created by @taylormetrics on TikTok, where they became a viral trend.

Size value over replacementOutlinePlugs in anywhereHardest to fitColourBalancedPerimeter shooterOn-ball creatorInterior bigDisruptor / connectorWhite what a perfect team would add
Gary Payton: The roster bends round himPaytonMichael Redd: The roster bends round himReddToni Kukoc: Fits most rostersKukocSam Cassell: The roster bends round himCassellTim Thomas: Hardest to fitThomasDesmond Mason: The roster bends round himD. MasonErvin Johnson: Needs some shapingJohnsonJoel Przybilla: Average fitPrzybillaDan Gadzuric: The roster bends round himGadzuricBELOW REPLACEMENT · NOT IN THE BOX · SAME SCALEJason Caffey: Hardest to fitCaffeyJamal Sampson: Offense-leaning, weak defenseSampsonMarcus Haislip: Hardest to fitHaislipAnthony Mason: Average fitA. Mason

Season by season

2000-012026-27

13%

of the box filled, 19 of 29. 9 players in the box, worth 11.7 per 100 above replacement.

−1.2

team fit, points per 100 its lineups are predicted to gain or lose by playing together (O +0.0, D −1.2). An estimate.

What fills the box

Share of the box by kind of player. The tick is the average of the season’s five fullest rosters.

Balanced8%
Perimeter shooter0%
On-ball creator5%
Interior big0%
Disruptor / connector0%
PlayerMPGDPMBox

This version uses Taylormetrics’ Wyman Diagram and Justin Liu’s model and packer. Size is DPM above a −2.0 replacement level to the power 2.2, times minutes per game. Outlines are an estimate: they predict the hand-drawn originals only weakly, so read them as a lean, not a stat. Playoff-adjusted moves each player by his career playoff offense change and playability.