Milwaukee Bucks

Also known as Wyman Diagrams. Created by @taylormetrics on TikTok, where they became a viral trend.

Size value over replacementOutlinePlugs in anywhereHardest to fitColourBalancedPerimeter shooterOn-ball creatorInterior bigDisruptor / connectorWhite what a perfect team would add
Michael Redd: The roster bends round himReddBobby Simmons: Average fitSimmonsT.J. Ford: Fits most rostersFordAndrew Bogut: Average fitBogutJoe Smith: Hardest to fitSmithCharlie Bell: Hardest to fitBellDan Gadzuric: Hardest to fitGadzuricJamaal Magloire: Needs some shapingMagloireToni Kukoc: The roster bends round himKukocMo Williams: Hardest to fitWilliamsBELOW REPLACEMENT · NOT IN THE BOX · SAME SCALEJiri Welsch: Hardest to fitWelschReece Gaines: The roster bends round himGainesJermaine Jackson: Needs some shapingJacksonErvin Johnson: Needs some shapingJohnson

Season by season

2000-012026-27

16%

of the box filled, 22 of 30. 10 players in the box, worth 12.1 per 100 above replacement.

−0.3

team fit, points per 100 its lineups are predicted to gain or lose by playing together (O −0.3, D −0.1). An estimate.

What fills the box

Share of the box by kind of player. The tick is the average of the season’s five fullest rosters.

Balanced3%
Perimeter shooter0%
On-ball creator8%
Interior big2%
Disruptor / connector3%
PlayerMPGDPMBox

This version uses Taylormetrics’ Wyman Diagram and Justin Liu’s model and packer. Size is DPM above a −2.0 replacement level to the power 2.2, times minutes per game. Outlines are an estimate: they predict the hand-drawn originals only weakly, so read them as a lean, not a stat. Playoff-adjusted moves each player by his career playoff offense change and playability.