Milwaukee Bucks

Also known as Wyman Diagrams. Created by @taylormetrics on TikTok, where they became a viral trend.

Size value over replacementOutlinePlugs in anywhereHardest to fitColourBalancedPerimeter shooterOn-ball creatorInterior bigDisruptor / connectorWhite what a perfect team would add
Michael Redd: The roster bends round himReddJoe Smith: Average fitSmithDan Gadzuric: Needs some shapingGadzuricToni Kukoc: Hardest to fitKukocDesmond Mason: The roster bends round himMasonMo Williams: Average fitWilliamsZaza Pachulia: Hardest to fitPachuliaAnthony Goldwire: The roster bends round himGoldwireCalvin Booth: Needs some shapingBoothBELOW REPLACEMENT · NOT IN THE BOX · SAME SCALEErick Strickland: Hardest to fitStricklandZendon Hamilton: Hardest to fitHamiltonKendall Gill: Hardest to fitGillMarcus Fizer: Hardest to fitFizerDaniel Santiago: The roster bends round himSantiagoReece Gaines: The roster bends round himGaines

Season by season

2000-012026-27

5%

of the box filled, 28 of 30. 9 players in the box, worth 7.5 per 100 above replacement.

−0.2

team fit, points per 100 its lineups are predicted to gain or lose by playing together (O +0.4, D −0.6). An estimate.

What fills the box

Share of the box by kind of player. The tick is the average of the season’s five fullest rosters.

Balanced0%
Perimeter shooter0%
On-ball creator2%
Interior big2%
Disruptor / connector1%
PlayerMPGDPMBox

This version uses Taylormetrics’ Wyman Diagram and Justin Liu’s model and packer. Size is DPM above a −2.0 replacement level to the power 2.2, times minutes per game. Outlines are an estimate: they predict the hand-drawn originals only weakly, so read them as a lean, not a stat. Playoff-adjusted moves each player by his career playoff offense change and playability.