Indiana Pacers

Also known as Wyman Diagrams. Created by @taylormetrics on TikTok, where they became a viral trend.

Size value over replacementOutlinePlugs in anywhereHardest to fitColourBalancedPerimeter shooterOn-ball creatorInterior bigDisruptor / connectorWhite what a perfect team would add
Danny Granger: The roster bends round himGrangerJeff Foster: Average fitFosterT.J. Ford: Average fitFordTroy Murphy: Average fitMurphyMarquis Daniels: Needs some shapingDanielsJarrett Jack: Average fitJackMike Dunleavy: Hardest to fitDunleavyTravis Diener: The roster bends round himDienerRasho Nesterovic: The roster bends round himNesterovicBrandon Rush: Hardest to fitRushRoy Hibbert: Hardest to fitHibbertBELOW REPLACEMENT · NOT IN THE BOX · SAME SCALEMaceo Baston: Needs some shapingBastonStephen Graham: Hardest to fitGrahamJosh McRoberts: Hardest to fitMcRoberts

Season by season

2000-012026-27

16%

of the box filled, 19 of 30. 11 players in the box, worth 11.8 per 100 above replacement.

+0.2

team fit, points per 100 its lineups are predicted to gain or lose by playing together (O +0.3, D −0.1). An estimate.

What fills the box

Share of the box by kind of player. The tick is the average of the season’s five fullest rosters.

Balanced2%
Perimeter shooter0%
On-ball creator9%
Interior big4%
Disruptor / connector0%
PlayerMPGDPMBox

This version uses Taylormetrics’ Wyman Diagram and Justin Liu’s model and packer. Size is DPM above a −2.0 replacement level to the power 2.2, times minutes per game. Outlines are an estimate: they predict the hand-drawn originals only weakly, so read them as a lean, not a stat. Playoff-adjusted moves each player by his career playoff offense change and playability.