Will Riley - NBA Draft Profile
Will Riley
NBA Draft Profile

Will Riley
Prospect Rank

Will Riley
Prospect Rank
Offensive Impact
2025 - Will Riley
Defensive Impact
2025 - Will Riley
Will Riley Season Stats (via cbbdata)
Offensive Stats
| Year | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
'25 Fr Illinois | 4.4 48 | 37.8 75 | 23.0% 45 | 53.3% 25 | 16.0% 80 | 7.4% 89 | 32.3% 42 |
Shooting Stats (per 100 poss)
| Year | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
'25 Fr Illinois | 6.9 50 | 65.0% 51 | 7.5 60 | 36.6% 44 | 9.6 77 | 32.6% 29 | 7.7 56 | 72.4% 37 |
Defensive Stats
| Year | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
'25 Fr Illinois | 0.8 16 | 0.6 1 | 1.0 12 | 5.2% 34 | 11.5% 8 | 1.9% 93 |
5-Game Rolling Average
Showing Usage Rate and TS% over time
Will Riley Stats Per Game vs Top 50 Opponents ()
Counting Stats
Counting Stats
Advanced Stats
Will Riley Shot Map
Will Riley Hoop-Explorer RAPM
Will Riley Shot Type Analysis
Will Riley HalfCourt Stats
Shot Type Breakdown
Will Riley's Shooting Stats
High School (1473 minutes)
NCAA (883 minutes)
Will Riley On/Off Impact
| Metric | On | Off | On-Off |
|---|---|---|---|
| Adj ORTG | 130.299 | 116.186 | +14.197 |
| EFG% | 53.6%80 | 50.4%53 | +3.2%78 |
| TOV% | 15.3%84 | 18.3%42 | -3.0%87 |
| ORB% | 37.6%98 | 30.9%61 | +6.7%96 |
| FTR | 34.1%60 | 34.9%66 | -0.8%43 |
| RIM FREQ | 31.5%10 | 32.7%20 | -1.2%34 |
| RIM ACC | 66.4%98 | 68.6%99 | -2.3%26 |
NBA Draft Comps
Historical player comparisons based on cosine similarity
| College Stats(relative to W. Riley) | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | Sim | BPM | OBPM | DBPM | Load | USG | AST | TS% | STL | BLK | OREB% | DREB% |
| 100% PkPick UD | 5.2 | 4.4 | 0.8 | 37.8 | 23.0% | 16.0 | 53.3% | 0.6 | 1.0 | 5.2 | 11.5 | |
| 91% PkPick 11 | -0.9 | -0.6 | -0.2 | -5.2 | -1.2% | -3.1 | 2.9% | 0.2 | 1.1 | -4.2 | -2.7 | |
| 89% PkPick 51 | -0.3 | -1.0 | 0.7 | -2.7 | 0.6% | -1.9 | -2.3% | 0.3 | 0.2 | 3.4 | 11.2 | |
| 89% PkPick 15 | 1.6 | 0.9 | 0.6 | -8.4 | -3.8% | -0.9 | 1.4% | 0.5 | 1.0 | 0.7 | -2.7 | |
| 87% PkPick UD | -3.1 | -2.4 | -0.7 | -0.6 | 1.2% | -2.9 | -0.3% | 0.5 | -0.2 | -1.5 | 7.2 | |
| 87% PkPick 7 | 1.3 | 0.4 | 0.9 | -0.8 | 1.7% | -6.4 | -1.1% | 0.8 | 0.4 | 2.0 | 1.3 | |
| 86% PkPick 2 | 1.5 | 1.0 | 0.5 | -2.2 | 1.6% | -4.7 | 2.0% | 1.3 | 2.6 | 0.9 | 3.9 | |
| 85% PkPick 14 | -0.2 | -0.5 | 0.3 | -3.7 | 2.5% | -1.8 | 0.9% | 0.7 | 1.7 | -0.4 | 1.3 | |
| 85% PkPick 29 | 0.5 | -0.9 | 1.4 | -6.0 | -1.3% | -5.4 | 2.5% | 0.9 | -0.4 | 0.3 | 5.0 | |
| 85% PkPick 9 | -1.0 | -1.4 | 0.4 | -4.7 | 0.0% | -7.3 | 2.4% | 0.9 | 0.0 | -1.9 | 3.0 | |
| 84% PkPick 50 | -0.2 | -0.4 | 0.2 | -5.2 | -1.1% | -1.4 | 6.6% | 0.9 | -0.1 | 1.0 | 2.7 | |
| 84% PkPick 17 | -1.1 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 2.9 | 5.8% | -3.8 | 1.5% | 0.9 | 0.1 | -2.9 | 2.4 | |
| 84% PkPick 52 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 0.7 | -10.5 | -4.8% | 5.2 | 4.1% | 0.2 | 0.5 | 3.6 | 0.6 | |
| 83% PkPick 17 | -0.1 | -0.5 | 0.4 | -4.9 | -1.2% | -5.2 | 0.4% | 0.8 | -0.4 | -1.5 | -0.5 | |
| 83% PkPick 1 | 1.9 | 1.1 | 0.8 | 3.0 | 4.2% | 1.5 | 2.5% | 1.3 | 1.7 | 1.3 | 7.6 | |
| 83% PkPick UD | -2.2 | -2.1 | -0.1 | -2.6 | 0.0% | 8.0 | -0.3% | 0.4 | -0.1 | -3.6 | 5.3 | |
| 82% PkPick 8 | 0.4 | -0.3 | 0.7 | -7.8 | -3.6% | -6.4 | 2.3% | 1.2 | 1.0 | 0.1 | 0.8 | |
| 82% PkPick UD | -0.7 | -0.9 | 0.2 | -3.8 | 0.2% | -8.4 | 7.0% | 0.5 | -0.2 | -3.2 | -0.6 | |
| 82% PkPick 23 | -2.3 | -1.6 | -0.7 | -12.4 | -6.9% | -4.1 | 0.3% | 0.2 | 0.3 | -1.7 | 1.8 | |
Film Cuts By Cashiggy
Videos via YouTubeProjected NBA Role
Skinny scoring wing with advanced pull-up game, touch, and secondary creation instincts. Projects as a long-term upside swing with self-creation, passing feel, and offensive versatility, but major questions remain about frame strength, off-ball shooting consistency, and defensive viability.
Swing Skill
Frame Strength: Must add muscle to withstand contact and finish drives without being bumped off path; Shot Selection and Efficiency: Needs to refine decision-making and improve off-ball shooting to complement on-ball scoring; Defensive Fundamentals: Must overhaul stance, screen navigation, and anticipation to avoid being a liability
NBA Player Comparisons
Brandon Ingram-lite: Smooth wing scorer who leverages touch, timing, and playmaking feel, but took time to develop strength and defensive reliability.
Taller Cam Thomas lite: confident pull-up scorer with limited shot diet diversity and minimal defensive value
Jordan Hall: tall wing initiator with touch and feel but limited strength and defensive presence
Detailed Analysis
Analysis by ReverseEnigma


