NC
NY
NYL
2025 profile
GP
41
MIN
28.6
Data2025 statsVPM2026 prior
Natasha Cloud
A complete WNBA profile across scoring, role, on/off context, and VPM impact.
Production
PTS70
10.1
REB63
3.7
AST93
5.1
Two-Way
MIN83
28.6
STL76
1.2
BLK51
0.3
TOV76
1.9
Shooting
TS%61
54.5%
3P%61
33.8%
2P%62
50.8%
Impact
rTSvs lg
+0.4
VPMvs lg
+0.8
NC
2025 Natasha Cloud
Shot Profile
PTS10.1
TS%54.5%
rTS+0.4
Below Avg
FT
Above Avg
League Avg
VOL
2.9 FTA/100 (-1.7)
4.7 FTA/100
EFF
87.0% (+8.3%)
78.7% FT
RIM
League Avg
VOL
3.8 FGA/100 (-0.8)
4.7 FGA/100
EFF
66.7% (+3.7%)
63.0% FG
MID
League Avg
VOL
4.4 FGA/100 (-1.9)
6.4 FGA/100
EFF
37.1% (-2.7%)
39.8% FG
Below Avg
3P
Above Avg
League Avg
VOL
6.5 3PA/100 (+0.3)
6.2 3PA/100
EFF
33.8% (-0.0%)
33.8% FG
databallr
Volume is attempts per 100 offensive possessions. League volume is team attempts per 100 divided by 5.
Impact Breakdown
Where 2025 value comes from — points per 100 possessions vs. a league-average player. Green helps the team.
RAPM prior: 2026
Net Impact
+0.82
Offense
+1.18
Defense
-0.35
Sample
4,798 poss
Offense+1.18
Shot Makingfield-goal value
+1.51Rim+0.90Mid+0.303PT+0.31
Free Throwsdrawing & making FTs
+0.44Ball Securityavoiding turnovers
+0.19Second Chanceoffensive boards
-0.96Defense-0.35
Shot Defenseopponent FG suppression
-0.00Rim-0.13Mid+0.113PT+0.02
Foul Disciplinelimiting opponent FTs
-0.25Forcing TOscreating turnovers
-0.04Defensive Boardsdenying second shots
-0.06VPM factor split. Shot value (field-goal efficiency by zone) + free throws + ball security (turnovers) + second chance (rebounding). Channels sum to each side's total; offense plus defense equals net.
Career Progression
Natasha Cloud's points per game over time
Career Log
10 seasons| Profile | Production | Shooting | Impact | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Season | Team | GP | MIN | PTS | AST | REB | STL | BLK | 3P% | TS% | rTS | NET |
| 2025 | NY NYL | 41 | 29 | 10.1 | 5.1 | 3.7 | 1.2 | 0.3 | 33.8% | 54.5% | +19.0 | — |
| 2024 |  PHO | 37 | 33 | 11.6 | 6.9 | 4.1 | 1.4 | 0.6 | 31.4% | 51.1% | +11.0 | — |
| 2023 |  WAS | 37 | 32 | 12.7 | 6.2 | 3.7 | 1.1 | 0.3 | 29.8% | 51.1% | +2.1 | — |
| 2022 | WAS | 34 | 32 | 10.7 | 7.0 | 3.6 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 31.9% | 52.3% | +12.0 | — |
| 2021 | WAS | 27 | 31 | 8.7 | 6.4 | 3.6 | 1.4 | 0.1 | 27.4% | 50.2% | -2.8 | — |
| 2019 | WAS | 34 | 32 | 9.0 | 5.6 | 2.5 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 32.6% | 50.0% | +5.3 | — |
| 2018 | WAS | 27 | 27 | 8.6 | 4.6 | 3.2 | 0.8 | 0.1 | 38.6% | 53.5% | -1.5 | — |
| 2017 | WAS | 24 | 19 | 4.4 | 2.9 | 2.5 | 0.7 | 0.1 | 23.5% | 40.8% | -11.6 | — |
| 2016 | WAS | 31 | 24 | 5.7 | 3.8 | 3.0 | 0.8 | 0.1 | 33.8% | 47.6% | -5.5 | — |
| 2015 | WAS | 34 | 19 | 3.6 | 3.4 | 2.8 | 0.9 | 0.1 | 23.7% | 41.6% | -0.8 | — |
| Career | 326 | 28 | 8.8 | 5.3 | 3.3 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 31.4% | 49.6% | +3.9 | — | |