NC
CH
CHI
2026 profile
GP
34
MIN
28.7
Data2026 currentRAPM2026 modelOn/OffNo row
Natasha Cloud
A complete WNBA profile across scoring, role, on/off context, and RAPM impact.
Production
PTS
10.5
REB
3.4
AST
5.0
Two-Way
MIN
28.7
STL
1.1
BLK
0.3
TOV
2.2
Shooting
TS%
59.9%
3P%
31.5%
2P%
57.7%
Impact
rTSvs lg
-0.1
RAPMvs lg
-1.8
NC
2026 Natasha Cloud
Shot Profile
PTS10.5
TS%59.9%
rTS-0.1
Below Avg
FT
Above Avg
League Avg
VOL
5.2 FTA/100 (-0.1)
5.3 FTA/100
EFF
86.4% (+7.7%)
78.7% FT
RIM
League Avg
VOL
3.4 FGA/100 (-1.8)
5.2 FGA/100
EFF
73.1% (+8.8%)
64.4% FG
MID
League Avg
VOL
3.8 FGA/100 (-1.9)
5.6 FGA/100
EFF
44.0% (+3.7%)
40.3% FG
Below Avg
3P
Above Avg
League Avg
VOL
5.6 3PA/100 (-0.8)
6.3 3PA/100
EFF
31.5% (-2.7%)
34.2% FG
databallr
Volume is attempts per 100 offensive possessions. League volume is team attempts per 100 divided by 5.
Impact Breakdown
Where 2026 value comes from — points per 100 possessions vs. a league-average player. Green helps the team.
Net Impact
-1.83
Offense
-1.74
Defense
-0.09
Sample
27,173 poss
Offense-1.74
Shot Makingfield-goal value
-1.32Rim-0.02Mid+0.143PT-1.44
Free Throwsdrawing & making FTs
+0.05Ball Securityavoiding turnovers
+0.61Second Chanceoffensive boards
-1.07Defense-0.09
Shot Defenseopponent FG suppression
+0.07Rim+0.16Mid+0.013PT-0.09
Foul Disciplinelimiting opponent FTs
-0.04Forcing TOscreating turnovers
+0.22Defensive Boardsdenying second shots
-0.36Alt3 eFG split RAPM. Shot value (field-goal efficiency by zone) + free throws + ball security (turnovers) + second chance (rebounding). Channels sum to each side's total; offense plus defense equals net.
Career Progression
Natasha Cloud's points per game over time
Career Log
11 seasons| Profile | Production | Shooting | Impact | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Season | Team | GP | MIN | PTS | AST | REB | STL | BLK | 3P% | TS% | rTS | NET |
| 2026 | CH CHI | 34 | 29 | 10.5 | 5.0 | 3.4 | 1.1 | 0.3 | 31.5% | 59.9% | -0.1 | -1.83 |
| 2025 |  NYL | 41 | 29 | 10.1 | 5.1 | 3.7 | 1.2 | 0.3 | 33.8% | 54.5% | +19.0 | — |
| 2024 |  PHO | 37 | 33 | 11.6 | 6.9 | 4.1 | 1.4 | 0.6 | 31.4% | 51.1% | +11.0 | — |
| 2023 |  WAS | 37 | 32 | 12.7 | 6.2 | 3.7 | 1.1 | 0.3 | 29.8% | 51.1% | +2.1 | — |
| 2022 | WAS | 34 | 32 | 10.7 | 7.0 | 3.6 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 31.9% | 52.3% | +12.0 | — |
| 2021 | WAS | 27 | 31 | 8.7 | 6.4 | 3.6 | 1.4 | 0.1 | 27.4% | 50.2% | -2.8 | — |
| 2019 | WAS | 34 | 32 | 9.0 | 5.6 | 2.5 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 32.6% | 50.0% | +5.3 | — |
| 2018 | WAS | 27 | 27 | 8.6 | 4.6 | 3.2 | 0.8 | 0.1 | 38.6% | 53.5% | -1.5 | — |
| 2017 | WAS | 24 | 19 | 4.4 | 2.9 | 2.5 | 0.7 | 0.1 | 23.5% | 40.8% | -11.6 | — |
| 2016 | WAS | 31 | 24 | 5.7 | 3.8 | 3.0 | 0.8 | 0.1 | 33.8% | 47.6% | -5.5 | — |
| 2015 | WAS | 34 | 19 | 3.6 | 3.4 | 2.8 | 0.9 | 0.1 | 23.7% | 41.6% | -0.8 | — |
| Career | 360 | 28 | 8.9 | 5.3 | 3.3 | 1.1 | 0.3 | 31.4% | 50.5% | +3.5 | -1.83 | |