CP
LV
LVA
2025 profile
GP
2
MIN
7.0
Data2025 statsVPM2026 prior
Cheyenne Parker-Tyus
A complete WNBA profile across scoring, role, on/off context, and VPM impact.
Production
PTS
8.0
REB
1.0
AST
0.0
Two-Way
MIN
7.0
STL
0.0
BLK
0.0
TOV
0.5
Shooting
TS%
72.7%
3P%
50.0%
2P%
66.7%
Impact
rTSvs lg
+18.6
VPMvs lg
+0.4
CP
2025 Cheyenne Parker-Tyus
Shot Profile
PTS8.0
TS%72.7%
rTS+18.6
Below Avg
FT
Above Avg
League Avg
VOL
21.4 FTA/100 (+16.8)
4.7 FTA/100
EFF
83.3% (+4.6%)
78.7% FT
RIM
League Avg
VOL
3.6 FGA/100 (-1.1)
4.7 FGA/100
EFF
100.0% (+37.0%)
63.0% FG
MID
League Avg
VOL
17.9 FGA/100 (+11.5)
6.4 FGA/100
EFF
60.0% (+20.2%)
39.8% FG
Below Avg
3P
Above Avg
League Avg
VOL
7.1 3PA/100 (+0.9)
6.2 3PA/100
EFF
50.0% (+16.2%)
33.8% FG
databallr
Volume is attempts per 100 offensive possessions. League volume is team attempts per 100 divided by 5.
Impact Breakdown
Where 2025 value comes from — points per 100 possessions vs. a league-average player. Green helps the team.
RAPM prior: 2026
Net Impact
+0.36
Offense
+0.90
Defense
-0.54
Sample
1,280 poss
Offense+0.90
Shot Makingfield-goal value
-0.43Rim+0.14Mid-0.383PT-0.19
Free Throwsdrawing & making FTs
+0.68Ball Securityavoiding turnovers
+0.10Second Chanceoffensive boards
+0.55Defense-0.54
Shot Defenseopponent FG suppression
-0.15Rim+0.38Mid-0.253PT-0.28
Foul Disciplinelimiting opponent FTs
-0.15Forcing TOscreating turnovers
-0.24Defensive Boardsdenying second shots
+0.01VPM factor split. Shot value (field-goal efficiency by zone) + free throws + ball security (turnovers) + second chance (rebounding). Channels sum to each side's total; offense plus defense equals net.
Career Progression
Cheyenne Parker-Tyus's points per game over time
Career Log
11 seasons| Profile | Production | Shooting | Impact | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Season | Team | GP | MIN | PTS | AST | REB | STL | BLK | 3P% | TS% | rTS | NET |
| 2025 | LV LVA | 2 | 7 | 8.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 50.0% | 72.7% | -4.1 | — |
| 2024 |  ATL | 25 | 20 | 9.2 | 1.5 | 4.8 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 21.4% | 52.5% | -1.0 | — |
| 2023 | ATL | 40 | 27 | 15.0 | 1.8 | 6.7 | 1.1 | 1.5 | 27.8% | 54.8% | -14.6 | — |
| 2022 | ATL | 36 | 26 | 11.8 | 2.0 | 6.2 | 1.0 | 0.9 | 21.8% | 55.2% | +1.0 | — |
| 2021 | ATL | 13 | 21 | 10.2 | 1.2 | 4.5 | 1.2 | 0.9 | 33.3% | 53.7% | +0.7 | — |
| 2020 |  CHI | 20 | 25 | 13.4 | 1.5 | 6.4 | 1.3 | 0.9 | 46.9% | 65.0% | +2.9 | — |
| 2019 | CHI | 34 | 20 | 8.8 | 0.9 | 5.8 | 0.7 | 1.2 | 27.8% | 54.2% | -1.4 | — |
| 2018 | CHI | 34 | 20 | 10.0 | 0.7 | 5.8 | 0.6 | 1.1 | 31.6% | 57.8% | +4.3 | — |
| 2017 | CHI | 23 | 12 | 3.8 | 0.6 | 3.4 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 0.0% | 52.4% | -0.5 | — |
| 2016 | CHI | 25 | 13 | 4.0 | 0.2 | 3.2 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.0% | 52.1% | -14.2 | — |
| 2015 | CHI | 30 | 9 | 2.2 | 0.2 | 2.5 | 0.2 | 0.7 | — | 40.2% | +15.8 | — |
| Career | 282 | 20 | 9.1 | 1.1 | 5.0 | 0.8 | 0.9 | 29.4% | 53.7% | -1.1 | — | |