EW
CH
CHI
2025 profile
GP
43
MIN
21.0
Data2025 statsVPM2026 prior
Elizabeth Williams
A complete WNBA profile across scoring, role, on/off context, and VPM impact.
Production
PTS61
8.5
REB85
5.2
AST57
1.8
Two-Way
MIN54
21.0
STL52
0.7
BLK82
0.9
TOV57
1.3
Shooting
TS%33
49.9%
3P%0
0.0%
2P%51
48.0%
Impact
rTSvs lg
-4.2
VPMvs lg
-2.1
EW
2025 Elizabeth Williams
Shot Profile
PTS8.5
TS%49.9%
rTS-4.2
Below Avg
FT
Above Avg
League Avg
VOL
4.7 FTA/100 (+0.0)
4.7 FTA/100
EFF
61.7% (-17.0%)
78.7% FT
RIM
League Avg
VOL
9.4 FGA/100 (+4.7)
4.7 FGA/100
EFF
60.5% (-2.5%)
63.0% FG
MID
League Avg
VOL
9.5 FGA/100 (+3.2)
6.4 FGA/100
EFF
35.8% (-4.1%)
39.8% FG
Below Avg
3P
Above Avg
League Avg
VOL
0.0 3PA/100 (-6.2)
6.2 3PA/100
EFF
0.0% (-33.8%)
33.8% FG
databallr
Volume is attempts per 100 offensive possessions. League volume is team attempts per 100 divided by 5.
Impact Breakdown
Where 2025 value comes from — points per 100 possessions vs. a league-average player. Green helps the team.
RAPM prior: 2026
Net Impact
-2.10
Offense
-2.70
Defense
+0.60
Sample
3,079 poss
Offense-2.70
Shot Makingfield-goal value
-2.32Rim-1.10Mid-1.313PT+0.10
Free Throwsdrawing & making FTs
-0.77Ball Securityavoiding turnovers
+0.15Second Chanceoffensive boards
+0.23Defense+0.60
Shot Defenseopponent FG suppression
+0.45Rim+0.31Mid-0.123PT+0.26
Foul Disciplinelimiting opponent FTs
+0.32Forcing TOscreating turnovers
-0.02Defensive Boardsdenying second shots
-0.15VPM factor split. Shot value (field-goal efficiency by zone) + free throws + ball security (turnovers) + second chance (rebounding). Channels sum to each side's total; offense plus defense equals net.
Career Progression
Elizabeth Williams's points per game over time
Career Log
11 seasons| Profile | Production | Shooting | Impact | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Season | Team | GP | MIN | PTS | AST | REB | STL | BLK | 3P% | TS% | rTS | NET |
| 2025 | CH CHI | 43 | 21 | 8.5 | 1.8 | 5.2 | 0.7 | 0.9 | — | 49.9% | -4.2 | — |
| 2024 | CH CHI | 9 | 28 | 10.0 | 1.6 | 7.0 | 1.7 | 1.7 | — | 51.7% | -1.7 | — |
| 2023 | CH CHI | 40 | 30 | 9.8 | 2.5 | 5.8 | 1.3 | 1.5 | — | 53.4% | -25.4 | — |
| 2022 |  WAS | 30 | 15 | 5.4 | 0.5 | 3.8 | 0.6 | 0.6 | — | 50.3% | +8.4 | — |
| 2021 |  ATL | 32 | 24 | 5.8 | 1.2 | 4.9 | 1.1 | 1.3 | — | 52.2% | -0.8 | — |
| 2020 | ATL | 22 | 29 | 10.1 | 1.4 | 5.7 | 0.8 | 1.4 | — | 53.3% | -0.9 | — |
| 2019 | ATL | 32 | 28 | 9.3 | 1.2 | 6.5 | 0.8 | 1.7 | — | 51.9% | +0.5 | — |
| 2018 | ATL | 33 | 27 | 9.1 | 1.4 | 5.8 | 0.8 | 1.8 | — | 55.6% | -1.7 | — |
| 2017 | ATL | 34 | 32 | 10.4 | 1.4 | 7.2 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 0.0% | 51.2% | -1.8 | — |
| 2016 | ATL | 34 | 35 | 11.9 | 1.2 | 8.1 | 0.8 | 2.3 | 0.0% | 48.6% | -7.1 | — |
| 2015 |  CON | 21 | 12 | 3.3 | 0.4 | 3.2 | 0.3 | 0.9 | — | 53.8% | +3.0 | — |
| Career | 330 | 26 | 8.6 | 1.4 | 5.8 | 0.9 | 1.5 | 0.0% | 51.9% | -3.9 | — | |