CG
LV
LVA
2026 profile
GP
34
MIN
33.2
Data2026 currentRAPM2026 modelOn/OffNo row
Chelsea Gray
A complete WNBA profile across scoring, role, on/off context, and RAPM impact.
Production
PTS
12.2
REB
3.1
AST
6.9
Two-Way
MIN
33.2
STL
1.2
BLK
0.3
TOV
2.9
Shooting
TS%
57.9%
3P%
39.4%
2P%
50.9%
Impact
rTSvs lg
-0.6
RAPMvs lg
+1.4
CG
LV
2026 Chelsea Gray
Shot Profile
PTS12.2
TS%57.9%
rTS-0.6
Below Avg
FT
Above Avg
League Avg
VOL
2.6 FTA/100 (-2.7)
5.3 FTA/100
EFF
93.0% (+14.3%)
78.6% FT
RIM
League Avg
VOL
0.7 FGA/100 (-4.5)
5.2 FGA/100
EFF
66.7% (+2.1%)
64.5% FG
MID
League Avg
VOL
7.1 FGA/100 (+1.4)
5.6 FGA/100
EFF
49.4% (+8.9%)
40.4% FG
Below Avg
3P
Above Avg
League Avg
VOL
7.3 3PA/100 (+1.0)
6.3 3PA/100
EFF
39.4% (+5.1%)
34.3% FG
databallr
Volume is attempts per 100 offensive possessions. League volume is team attempts per 100 divided by 5.
Impact Breakdown
Where 2026 value comes from — points per 100 possessions vs. a league-average player. Green helps the team.
Net Impact
+1.40
Offense
+0.86
Defense
+0.53
Sample
33,093 poss
Offense+0.86
Shot Makingfield-goal value
+0.57Rim+0.03Mid+0.033PT+0.52
Free Throwsdrawing & making FTs
-0.04Ball Securityavoiding turnovers
+0.37Second Chanceoffensive boards
-0.03Defense+0.53
Shot Defenseopponent FG suppression
+0.23Rim-0.32Mid+0.173PT+0.38
Foul Disciplinelimiting opponent FTs
+0.32Forcing TOscreating turnovers
-0.15Defensive Boardsdenying second shots
+0.13Alt3 eFG split RAPM. Shot value (field-goal efficiency by zone) + free throws + ball security (turnovers) + second chance (rebounding). Channels sum to each side's total; offense plus defense equals net.
Career Progression
Chelsea Gray's points per game over time
Career Log
12 seasons| Profile | Production | Shooting | Impact | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Season | Team | GP | MIN | PTS | AST | REB | STL | BLK | 3P% | TS% | rTS | NET |
| 2026 | LV LVA | 34 | 33 | 12.2 | 6.9 | 3.1 | 1.2 | 0.3 | 39.4% | 57.9% | -0.6 | +1.40 |
| 2025 | LV LVA | 44 | 31 | 11.2 | 5.4 | 3.9 | 1.4 | 0.6 | 36.8% | 56.9% | -0.8 | — |
| 2024 | LV LVA | 27 | 26 | 8.6 | 4.9 | 2.9 | 1.3 | 0.7 | 33.8% | 51.3% | -5.0 | — |
| 2023 | LV LVA | 40 | 32 | 15.3 | 7.3 | 4.0 | 1.4 | 0.6 | 42.1% | 60.2% | -1.4 | — |
| 2022 | LV LVA | 35 | 30 | 13.7 | 6.1 | 3.2 | 1.6 | 0.3 | 34.0% | 58.4% | +19.7 | — |
| 2021 | LV LVA | 32 | 29 | 11.1 | 5.9 | 2.9 | 1.2 | 0.3 | 38.0% | 51.7% | +2.0 | — |
| 2020 |  LAS | 22 | 31 | 14.0 | 5.3 | 3.7 | 1.5 | 0.1 | 30.5% | 51.7% | -32.0 | — |
| 2019 | LAS | 34 | 33 | 14.5 | 5.9 | 3.8 | 1.0 | 0.1 | 38.2% | 50.3% | -11.0 | — |
| 2018 | LAS | 34 | 33 | 14.9 | 5.1 | 3.4 | 1.4 | 0.2 | 39.2% | 56.7% | -0.4 | — |
| 2017 | LAS | 34 | 33 | 14.8 | 4.4 | 3.3 | 1.1 | 0.2 | 48.2% | 61.4% | +3.2 | — |
| 2016 | LAS | 33 | 16 | 5.9 | 2.2 | 1.8 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 30.4% | 54.8% | +0.9 | — |
| 2015 |  CON | 34 | 16 | 6.9 | 2.7 | 2.3 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 34.8% | 52.2% | +1.3 | — |
| Career | 403 | 29 | 12.0 | 5.2 | 3.2 | 1.2 | 0.3 | 38.1% | 55.6% | -1.0 | +1.40 | |