NH
MI
MIN
2026 profile
GP
35
MIN
28.9
Data2026 currentRAPM2026 modelOn/OffNo row
Natasha Howard
A complete WNBA profile across scoring, role, on/off context, and RAPM impact.
Production
PTS
15.2
REB
7.7
AST
3.3
Two-Way
MIN
28.9
STL
1.8
BLK
0.9
TOV
2.5
Shooting
TS%
62.6%
3P%
23.1%
2P%
60.3%
Impact
rTSvs lg
+0.2
RAPMvs lg
+1.0
NH
MI
2026 Natasha Howard
Shot Profile
PTS15.2
TS%62.6%
rTS+0.2
Below Avg
FT
Above Avg
League Avg
VOL
6.4 FTA/100 (+1.2)
5.3 FTA/100
EFF
71.8% (-6.9%)
78.6% FT
RIM
League Avg
VOL
11.9 FGA/100 (+6.7)
5.2 FGA/100
EFF
66.7% (+2.1%)
64.5% FG
MID
League Avg
VOL
5.5 FGA/100 (-0.1)
5.6 FGA/100
EFF
46.4% (+6.0%)
40.4% FG
Below Avg
3P
Above Avg
League Avg
VOL
0.6 3PA/100 (-5.7)
6.3 3PA/100
EFF
23.1% (-11.2%)
34.3% FG
databallr
Volume is attempts per 100 offensive possessions. League volume is team attempts per 100 divided by 5.
Impact Breakdown
Where 2026 value comes from — points per 100 possessions vs. a league-average player. Green helps the team.
Net Impact
+0.96
Offense
+1.42
Defense
-0.46
Sample
26,940 poss
Offense+1.42
Shot Makingfield-goal value
+0.58Rim+0.54Mid-0.203PT+0.24
Free Throwsdrawing & making FTs
-0.32Ball Securityavoiding turnovers
+0.08Second Chanceoffensive boards
+1.08Defense-0.46
Shot Defenseopponent FG suppression
+0.05Rim+0.02Mid-0.033PT+0.06
Foul Disciplinelimiting opponent FTs
-0.04Forcing TOscreating turnovers
-0.17Defensive Boardsdenying second shots
-0.30Alt3 eFG split RAPM. Shot value (field-goal efficiency by zone) + free throws + ball security (turnovers) + second chance (rebounding). Channels sum to each side's total; offense plus defense equals net.
Career Progression
Natasha Howard's points per game over time
Career Log
13 seasons| Profile | Production | Shooting | Impact | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Season | Team | GP | MIN | PTS | AST | REB | STL | BLK | 3P% | TS% | rTS | NET |
| 2026 | MI MIN | 35 | 29 | 15.2 | 3.3 | 7.7 | 1.8 | 0.9 | 23.1% | 62.6% | +0.2 | +0.96 |
| 2025 |  IND | 44 | 24 | 11.4 | 1.5 | 6.6 | 1.2 | 0.6 | 18.2% | 59.0% | -1.3 | — |
| 2024 |  DAL | 27 | 31 | 17.6 | 2.9 | 6.7 | 1.3 | 0.8 | 20.0% | 50.6% | -2.9 | — |
| 2023 | DAL | 39 | 33 | 16.5 | 2.6 | 8.0 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 29.9% | 53.2% | -10.5 | — |
| 2022 |  NYL | 35 | 30 | 15.1 | 2.3 | 7.3 | 1.3 | 1.0 | 32.6% | 55.1% | -5.2 | — |
| 2021 | NYL | 13 | 27 | 16.2 | 1.7 | 7.2 | 1.3 | 0.5 | 33.3% | 55.3% | -3.0 | — |
| 2020 |  SEA | 22 | 21 | 9.5 | 1.0 | 7.1 | 1.7 | 0.6 | 35.0% | 57.7% | +6.4 | — |
| 2019 | SEA | 34 | 31 | 18.1 | 2.1 | 8.2 | 2.2 | 1.7 | 30.8% | 52.3% | -1.4 | — |
| 2018 | SEA | 34 | 26 | 13.2 | 1.0 | 6.4 | 1.3 | 2.0 | 32.7% | 61.1% | +10.7 | — |
| 2017 | MI MIN | 34 | 12 | 4.3 | 0.7 | 2.4 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 21.4% | 52.9% | -19.6 | — |
| 2016 | MI MIN | 34 | 15 | 6.7 | 0.8 | 3.6 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 20.0% | 60.4% | +15.1 | — |
| 2015 | IND | 30 | 11 | 4.2 | 0.4 | 2.6 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.0% | 44.0% | +45.3 | — |
| 2014 | IND | 34 | 17 | 7.0 | 0.6 | 3.1 | 0.8 | 0.7 | 0.0% | 47.6% | -22.9 | — |
| Career | 415 | 24 | 11.8 | 1.6 | 5.9 | 1.2 | 0.9 | 651874190023858048.0% | 54.9% | +0.3 | +0.96 | |