KM
MI
MIN
2026 profile
GP
35
MIN
32.2
Data2026 currentRAPM2026 modelOn/OffNo row
Kayla McBride
A complete WNBA profile across scoring, role, on/off context, and RAPM impact.
Production
PTS
18.4
REB
3.2
AST
2.1
Two-Way
MIN
32.2
STL
1.7
BLK
0.3
TOV
1.3
Shooting
TS%
64.1%
3P%
42.4%
2P%
52.6%
Impact
rTSvs lg
+0.7
RAPMvs lg
+2.3
KM
MI
2026 Kayla McBride
Shot Profile
PTS18.4
TS%64.1%
rTS+0.7
Below Avg
FT
Above Avg
League Avg
VOL
5.5 FTA/100 (+0.2)
5.3 FTA/100
EFF
91.9% (+13.3%)
78.6% FT
RIM
League Avg
VOL
4.1 FGA/100 (-1.1)
5.2 FGA/100
EFF
67.7% (+3.2%)
64.5% FG
MID
League Avg
VOL
5.1 FGA/100 (-0.5)
5.6 FGA/100
EFF
40.5% (+0.1%)
40.4% FG
Below Avg
3P
Above Avg
League Avg
VOL
10.7 3PA/100 (+4.4)
6.3 3PA/100
EFF
42.4% (+8.1%)
34.3% FG
databallr
Volume is attempts per 100 offensive possessions. League volume is team attempts per 100 divided by 5.
Impact Breakdown
Where 2026 value comes from — points per 100 possessions vs. a league-average player. Green helps the team.
Net Impact
+2.35
Offense
+1.71
Defense
+0.63
Sample
30,110 poss
Offense+1.71
Shot Makingfield-goal value
+1.02Rim+0.58Mid+0.083PT+0.36
Free Throwsdrawing & making FTs
-0.06Ball Securityavoiding turnovers
+0.16Second Chanceoffensive boards
+0.59Defense+0.63
Shot Defenseopponent FG suppression
+1.08Rim+0.49Mid+0.113PT+0.49
Foul Disciplinelimiting opponent FTs
+0.35Forcing TOscreating turnovers
-0.33Defensive Boardsdenying second shots
-0.47Alt3 eFG split RAPM. Shot value (field-goal efficiency by zone) + free throws + ball security (turnovers) + second chance (rebounding). Channels sum to each side's total; offense plus defense equals net.
Career Progression
Kayla McBride's points per game over time
Career Log
13 seasons| Profile | Production | Shooting | Impact | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Season | Team | GP | MIN | PTS | AST | REB | STL | BLK | 3P% | TS% | rTS | NET |
| 2026 | MI MIN | 35 | 32 | 18.4 | 2.1 | 3.2 | 1.7 | 0.3 | 42.4% | 64.1% | +0.7 | +2.35 |
| 2025 | MI MIN | 39 | 31 | 14.2 | 3.5 | 2.3 | 1.3 | 0.1 | 39.5% | 58.5% | +8.2 | — |
| 2024 | MI MIN | 39 | 32 | 15.0 | 3.2 | 2.6 | 1.3 | 0.1 | 40.7% | 60.6% | +5.3 | — |
| 2023 | MI MIN | 38 | 32 | 14.3 | 2.2 | 3.2 | 1.2 | 0.2 | 34.2% | 55.0% | +3.5 | — |
| 2022 | MI MIN | 31 | 30 | 13.3 | 2.1 | 2.8 | 1.0 | 0.1 | 35.6% | 53.5% | -0.4 | — |
| 2021 | MI MIN | 32 | 32 | 13.7 | 2.3 | 3.6 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 37.9% | 58.1% | +14.9 | — |
| 2020 |  LVA | 22 | 27 | 12.5 | 2.4 | 2.3 | 1.2 | 0.1 | 34.2% | 54.5% | -3.5 | — |
| 2019 | LVA | 34 | 29 | 13.3 | 2.6 | 4.2 | 1.2 | 0.1 | 42.8% | 56.2% | +10.4 | — |
| 2018 | LVA | 31 | 32 | 18.2 | 3.5 | 3.9 | 1.1 | 0.1 | 39.3% | 56.3% | +2.8 | — |
| 2017 |  SAN | 30 | 33 | 15.4 | 2.6 | 4.1 | 1.1 | 0.2 | 31.0% | 52.8% | -0.2 | — |
| 2016 | SAN | 17 | 31 | 17.1 | 1.9 | 4.0 | 1.1 | 0.1 | 30.5% | 46.6% | -6.6 | — |
| 2015 | SAN | 27 | 28 | 13.8 | 1.6 | 3.1 | 1.1 | 0.1 | 37.3% | 49.7% | -1.1 | — |
| 2014 | SAN | 34 | 26 | 13.0 | 1.7 | 2.3 | 1.0 | 0.1 | 39.6% | 52.5% | +23.5 | — |
| Career | 409 | 30 | 14.7 | 2.5 | 3.2 | 1.2 | 0.1 | 37.9% | 55.9% | +5.3 | +2.35 | |