SD
SE
SEA
2025 profile
GP
43
MIN
31.2
Data2025 statsVPM2026 prior
Skylar Diggins
A complete WNBA profile across scoring, role, on/off context, and VPM impact.
Production
PTS90
15.5
REB44
2.5
AST97
6.0
Two-Way
MIN92
31.2
STL77
1.2
BLK80
0.8
TOV85
2.1
Shooting
TS%52
53.2%
3P%73
36.5%
2P%36
45.0%
Impact
rTSvs lg
-0.9
VPMvs lg
+1.2
SD
2025 Skylar Diggins
Shot Profile
PTS15.5
TS%53.2%
rTS-0.9
Below Avg
FT
Above Avg
League Avg
VOL
7.2 FTA/100 (+2.5)
4.7 FTA/100
EFF
78.8% (+0.1%)
78.7% FT
RIM
League Avg
VOL
3.9 FGA/100 (-0.7)
4.7 FGA/100
EFF
60.6% (-2.4%)
63.0% FG
MID
League Avg
VOL
10.0 FGA/100 (+3.7)
6.4 FGA/100
EFF
38.9% (-1.0%)
39.8% FG
Below Avg
3P
Above Avg
League Avg
VOL
6.4 3PA/100 (+0.3)
6.2 3PA/100
EFF
36.5% (+2.7%)
33.8% FG
databallr
Volume is attempts per 100 offensive possessions. League volume is team attempts per 100 divided by 5.
Impact Breakdown
Where 2025 value comes from — points per 100 possessions vs. a league-average player. Green helps the team.
RAPM prior: 2026
Net Impact
+1.22
Offense
+1.15
Defense
+0.06
Sample
2,347 poss
Offense+1.15
Shot Makingfield-goal value
+0.09Rim-0.64Mid+0.163PT+0.58
Free Throwsdrawing & making FTs
+0.44Ball Securityavoiding turnovers
+1.14Second Chanceoffensive boards
-0.51Defense+0.06
Shot Defenseopponent FG suppression
+0.14Rim-0.07Mid+0.113PT+0.10
Foul Disciplinelimiting opponent FTs
+0.24Forcing TOscreating turnovers
-0.16Defensive Boardsdenying second shots
-0.16VPM factor split. Shot value (field-goal efficiency by zone) + free throws + ball security (turnovers) + second chance (rebounding). Channels sum to each side's total; offense plus defense equals net.
Career Progression
Skylar Diggins's points per game over time
Career Log
11 seasons| Profile | Production | Shooting | Impact | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Season | Team | GP | MIN | PTS | AST | REB | STL | BLK | 3P% | TS% | rTS | NET |
| 2025 | SE SEA | 43 | 31 | 15.5 | 6.0 | 2.5 | 1.2 | 0.8 | 36.5% | 53.2% | +0.2 | — |
| 2024 | SE SEA | 40 | 31 | 15.1 | 6.4 | 2.6 | 1.7 | 0.9 | 29.1% | 52.3% | -10.8 | — |
| 2022 |  PHO | 30 | 34 | 19.7 | 5.5 | 4.0 | 1.5 | 1.0 | 29.6% | 53.3% | -0.9 | — |
| 2021 | PHO | 32 | 33 | 17.7 | 5.3 | 3.2 | 1.1 | 0.8 | 37.0% | 59.0% | -6.6 | — |
| 2020 | PHO | 22 | 31 | 17.7 | 4.2 | 3.3 | 0.9 | 0.5 | 39.7% | 62.1% | -12.2 | — |
| 2018 |  DAL | 32 | 34 | 17.9 | 6.2 | 3.3 | 1.4 | 0.5 | 29.7% | 52.6% | -1.3 | — |
| 2017 | DAL | 34 | 34 | 18.5 | 5.8 | 3.5 | 1.3 | 0.8 | 35.0% | 56.4% | -13.5 | — |
| 2016 | DAL | 27 | 28 | 13.1 | 3.4 | 1.9 | 1.1 | 0.3 | 29.9% | 50.1% | -2.9 | — |
| 2015 |  TUL | 9 | 32 | 17.8 | 5.0 | 2.7 | 1.6 | 0.3 | 44.8% | 53.4% | +2.5 | — |
| 2014 | TUL | 34 | 35 | 20.1 | 5.0 | 2.5 | 1.5 | 0.6 | 28.2% | 52.6% | +1.0 | — |
| 2013 | TUL | 32 | 26 | 8.5 | 3.8 | 1.9 | 1.3 | 0.3 | 24.4% | 43.5% | -6.8 | — |
| Career | 335 | 32 | 16.4 | 5.3 | 2.9 | 1.3 | 0.7 | 32.6% | 53.3% | -5.0 | — | |