CV
CH
CHI
2025 profile
GP
7
MIN
27.3
Data2025 statsVPM2026 prior
Courtney Vandersloot
A complete WNBA profile across scoring, role, on/off context, and VPM impact.
Production
PTS73
10.6
REB55
3.1
AST94
5.3
Two-Way
MIN77
27.3
STL92
1.6
BLK45
0.3
TOV94
2.4
Shooting
TS%43
52.1%
3P%21
21.7%
2P%85
55.8%
Impact
rTSvs lg
-2.5
VPMvs lg
+2.2
CV
2025 Courtney Vandersloot
Shot Profile
PTS10.6
TS%52.1%
rTS-2.5
Below Avg
FT
Above Avg
League Avg
VOL
3.3 FTA/100 (-1.4)
4.7 FTA/100
EFF
84.6% (+5.9%)
78.7% FT
RIM
League Avg
VOL
4.3 FGA/100 (-0.4)
4.7 FGA/100
EFF
58.8% (-4.2%)
63.0% FG
MID
League Avg
VOL
6.6 FGA/100 (+0.2)
6.4 FGA/100
EFF
53.8% (+14.0%)
39.8% FG
Below Avg
3P
Above Avg
League Avg
VOL
5.8 3PA/100 (-0.4)
6.2 3PA/100
EFF
21.7% (-12.0%)
33.8% FG
databallr
Volume is attempts per 100 offensive possessions. League volume is team attempts per 100 divided by 5.
Impact Breakdown
Where 2025 value comes from — points per 100 possessions vs. a league-average player. Green helps the team.
RAPM prior: 2026
Net Impact
+2.18
Offense
+1.68
Defense
+0.50
Sample
2,399 poss
Offense+1.68
Shot Makingfield-goal value
+2.16Rim+1.31Mid+0.183PT+0.67
Free Throwsdrawing & making FTs
-0.11Ball Securityavoiding turnovers
+0.30Second Chanceoffensive boards
-0.67Defense+0.50
Shot Defenseopponent FG suppression
+0.19Rim-0.11Mid+0.243PT+0.06
Foul Disciplinelimiting opponent FTs
-0.04Forcing TOscreating turnovers
+0.32Defensive Boardsdenying second shots
+0.03VPM factor split. Shot value (field-goal efficiency by zone) + free throws + ball security (turnovers) + second chance (rebounding). Channels sum to each side's total; offense plus defense equals net.
Career Progression
Courtney Vandersloot's points per game over time
Career Log
13 seasons| Profile | Production | Shooting | Impact | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Season | Team | GP | MIN | PTS | AST | REB | STL | BLK | 3P% | TS% | rTS | NET |
| 2025 | CH CHI | 7 | 27 | 10.6 | 5.3 | 3.1 | 1.6 | 0.3 | 21.7% | 52.1% | -2.5 | — |
| 2024 |  NYL | 31 | 22 | 6.4 | 4.8 | 2.6 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 26.9% | 50.3% | +2.3 | — |
| 2023 | NYL | 39 | 30 | 10.5 | 8.1 | 3.5 | 1.3 | 0.6 | 29.4% | 52.2% | -3.0 | — |
| 2022 | CH CHI | 32 | 27 | 11.8 | 6.5 | 3.9 | 1.2 | 0.5 | 36.7% | 56.9% | +0.7 | — |
| 2021 | CH CHI | 32 | 30 | 10.5 | 8.6 | 3.4 | 1.7 | 0.4 | 34.6% | 52.4% | +4.5 | — |
| 2020 | CH CHI | 22 | 32 | 13.6 | 10.0 | 3.5 | 1.2 | 0.4 | 39.5% | 61.0% | +5.7 | — |
| 2019 | CH CHI | 33 | 30 | 11.2 | 9.1 | 4.3 | 1.4 | 0.5 | 29.0% | 54.8% | -9.3 | — |
| 2018 | CH CHI | 30 | 32 | 12.5 | 8.6 | 3.7 | 1.3 | 0.6 | 39.8% | 60.4% | +6.9 | — |
| 2017 | CH CHI | 27 | 30 | 11.5 | 8.1 | 3.7 | 1.2 | 0.2 | 38.2% | 59.4% | +6.5 | — |
| 2016 | CH CHI | 30 | 24 | 9.5 | 4.7 | 2.7 | 1.4 | 0.1 | 35.1% | 53.6% | +3.1 | — |
| 2015 | CH CHI | 34 | 30 | 11.4 | 5.8 | 3.4 | 1.3 | 0.5 | 35.6% | 56.2% | +6.1 | — |
| 2014 | CH CHI | 17 | 26 | 7.2 | 6.0 | 2.3 | 1.2 | 0.5 | 37.5% | 48.4% | -5.1 | — |
| 2013 | CH CHI | 33 | 30 | 8.8 | 5.6 | 3.2 | 1.4 | 0.8 | 30.4% | 47.8% | -17.0 | — |
| Career | 367 | 29 | 10.4 | 7.1 | 3.4 | 1.3 | 0.5 | 33.9% | 54.3% | -0.1 | — | |