DB
PH
PHX
2025 profile
GP
33
MIN
23.6
Data2025 statsVPM2026 prior
DeWanna Bonner
A complete WNBA profile across scoring, role, on/off context, and VPM impact.
Production
PTS69
9.8
REB69
4.2
AST39
1.2
Two-Way
MIN62
23.6
STL63
0.8
BLK44
0.3
TOV31
0.8
Shooting
TS%64
54.6%
3P%55
33.3%
2P%47
47.4%
Impact
rTSvs lg
+0.6
VPMvs lg
-0.6
DB
2025 DeWanna Bonner
Shot Profile
PTS9.8
TS%54.6%
rTS+0.6
Below Avg
FT
Above Avg
League Avg
VOL
5.7 FTA/100 (+1.0)
4.7 FTA/100
EFF
87.2% (+8.5%)
78.7% FT
RIM
League Avg
VOL
4.6 FGA/100 (-0.0)
4.7 FGA/100
EFF
61.4% (-1.6%)
63.0% FG
MID
League Avg
VOL
4.4 FGA/100 (-2.0)
6.4 FGA/100
EFF
32.8% (-7.0%)
39.8% FG
Below Avg
3P
Above Avg
League Avg
VOL
7.9 3PA/100 (+1.7)
6.2 3PA/100
EFF
33.3% (-0.4%)
33.8% FG
databallr
Volume is attempts per 100 offensive possessions. League volume is team attempts per 100 divided by 5.
Impact Breakdown
Where 2025 value comes from — points per 100 possessions vs. a league-average player. Green helps the team.
RAPM prior: 2026
Net Impact
-0.62
Offense
-1.79
Defense
+1.17
Sample
4,421 poss
Offense-1.79
Shot Makingfield-goal value
-1.93Rim+0.20Mid-0.593PT-1.55
Free Throwsdrawing & making FTs
+0.38Ball Securityavoiding turnovers
+0.47Second Chanceoffensive boards
-0.71Defense+1.17
Shot Defenseopponent FG suppression
+0.62Rim+0.15Mid+0.113PT+0.36
Foul Disciplinelimiting opponent FTs
+0.14Forcing TOscreating turnovers
+0.15Defensive Boardsdenying second shots
+0.27VPM factor split. Shot value (field-goal efficiency by zone) + free throws + ball security (turnovers) + second chance (rebounding). Channels sum to each side's total; offense plus defense equals net.
Career Progression
DeWanna Bonner's points per game over time
Career Log
12 seasons| Profile | Production | Shooting | Impact | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Season | Team | GP | MIN | PTS | AST | REB | STL | BLK | 3P% | TS% | rTS | NET |
| 2025 | PH PHX | 33 | 24 | 9.8 | 1.2 | 4.2 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 33.3% | 54.6% | -4.1 | — |
| 2024 |  CON | 40 | 31 | 15.1 | 2.0 | 6.0 | 1.2 | 0.7 | 29.4% | 52.2% | +0.2 | — |
| 2023 | CON | 40 | 30 | 17.4 | 2.2 | 5.6 | 1.1 | 0.6 | 32.9% | 54.8% | -2.4 | — |
| 2022 | CON | 33 | 30 | 13.5 | 2.8 | 4.7 | 1.2 | 0.3 | 32.9% | 54.8% | -7.2 | — |
| 2021 | CON | 32 | 32 | 15.2 | 3.4 | 6.4 | 1.3 | 0.7 | 31.7% | 51.8% | -0.0 | — |
| 2020 | CON | 22 | 33 | 19.7 | 3.0 | 7.8 | 1.7 | 0.5 | 25.2% | 53.5% | -7.6 | — |
| 2019 | PH PHO | 34 | 33 | 17.2 | 2.7 | 7.6 | 1.3 | 0.6 | 27.2% | 50.4% | +3.8 | — |
| 2018 | PH PHO | 34 | 33 | 17.3 | 3.2 | 7.2 | 1.3 | 0.4 | 31.3% | 56.7% | +8.6 | — |
| 2016 | PH PHO | 34 | 31 | 14.5 | 2.4 | 5.4 | 1.3 | 0.6 | 32.9% | 56.3% | -3.1 | — |
| 2015 | PH PHO | 33 | 33 | 15.8 | 3.3 | 5.7 | 1.3 | 0.8 | 25.4% | 50.0% | +8.3 | — |
| 2014 | PH PHO | 34 | 29 | 10.4 | 2.3 | 4.1 | 1.4 | 0.4 | 27.9% | 54.6% | -4.1 | — |
| 2013 | PH PHO | 34 | 33 | 14.5 | 2.4 | 5.8 | 1.1 | 0.3 | 32.5% | 54.7% | -10.9 | — |
| Career | 403 | 31 | 14.9 | 2.5 | 5.8 | 1.2 | 0.5 | 30.5% | 53.7% | -1.4 | — | |