DB
PH
PHX
2026 profile
GP
25
MIN
26.6
Data2026 currentRAPM2026 modelOn/OffNo row
DeWanna Bonner
A complete WNBA profile across scoring, role, on/off context, and RAPM impact.
Production
PTS
9.0
REB
5.3
AST
1.3
Two-Way
MIN
26.6
STL
1.1
BLK
0.7
TOV
0.8
Shooting
TS%
49.3%
3P%
24.3%
2P%
53.1%
Impact
rTSvs lg
-6.3
RAPMvs lg
+1.4
DB
2026 DeWanna Bonner
Shot Profile
PTS9.0
TS%49.3%
rTS-6.3
Below Avg
FT
Above Avg
League Avg
VOL
3.6 FTA/100 (-1.7)
5.3 FTA/100
EFF
87.2% (+8.8%)
78.5% FT
RIM
League Avg
VOL
4.3 FGA/100 (-0.9)
5.2 FGA/100
EFF
71.4% (+7.5%)
63.9% FG
MID
League Avg
VOL
3.2 FGA/100 (-2.4)
5.6 FGA/100
EFF
28.6% (-11.7%)
40.3% FG
Below Avg
3P
Above Avg
League Avg
VOL
8.5 3PA/100 (+2.3)
6.3 3PA/100
EFF
24.3% (-9.3%)
33.6% FG
databallr
Volume is attempts per 100 offensive possessions. League volume is team attempts per 100 divided by 5.
Impact Breakdown
Where 2026 value comes from — points per 100 possessions vs. a league-average player. Green helps the team.
Net Impact
+1.36
Offense
+0.09
Defense
+1.27
Sample
25,662 poss
Offense+0.09
Shot Makingfield-goal value
+0.22Rim+0.56Mid-0.713PT+0.37
Free Throwsdrawing & making FTs
+0.37Ball Securityavoiding turnovers
-0.68Second Chanceoffensive boards
+0.18Defense+1.27
Shot Defenseopponent FG suppression
+0.20Rim+0.21Mid+0.223PT-0.23
Foul Disciplinelimiting opponent FTs
-0.04Forcing TOscreating turnovers
+0.53Defensive Boardsdenying second shots
+0.58Alt3 eFG split RAPM. Shot value (field-goal efficiency by zone) + free throws + ball security (turnovers) + second chance (rebounding). Channels sum to each side's total; offense plus defense equals net.
Career Progression
DeWanna Bonner's points per game over time
Career Log
13 seasons| Profile | Production | Shooting | Impact | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Season | Team | GP | MIN | PTS | AST | REB | STL | BLK | 3P% | TS% | rTS | NET |
| 2026 | PH PHX | 25 | 27 | 9.0 | 1.3 | 5.3 | 1.1 | 0.7 | 24.3% | 49.3% | -6.3 | +1.36 |
| 2025 | PH PHX | 33 | 24 | 9.8 | 1.2 | 4.2 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 33.3% | 54.6% | -- | — |
| 2024 |  CON | 40 | 31 | 15.1 | 2.0 | 6.0 | 1.2 | 0.7 | 29.4% | 52.2% | -- | — |
| 2023 | CON | 40 | 30 | 17.4 | 2.2 | 5.6 | 1.1 | 0.6 | 32.9% | 54.8% | -- | — |
| 2022 | CON | 33 | 30 | 13.5 | 2.8 | 4.7 | 1.2 | 0.3 | 32.9% | 54.8% | -- | — |
| 2021 | CON | 32 | 32 | 15.2 | 3.4 | 6.4 | 1.3 | 0.7 | 31.7% | 51.8% | -- | — |
| 2020 | CON | 22 | 33 | 19.7 | 3.0 | 7.8 | 1.7 | 0.5 | 25.2% | 53.5% | -- | — |
| 2019 | PH PHO | 34 | 33 | 17.2 | 2.7 | 7.6 | 1.3 | 0.6 | 27.2% | 50.4% | -- | — |
| 2018 | PH PHO | 34 | 33 | 17.3 | 3.2 | 7.2 | 1.3 | 0.4 | 31.3% | 56.7% | -- | — |
| 2016 | PH PHO | 34 | 31 | 14.5 | 2.4 | 5.4 | 1.3 | 0.6 | 32.9% | 56.3% | -- | — |
| 2015 | PH PHO | 33 | 33 | 15.8 | 3.3 | 5.7 | 1.3 | 0.8 | 25.4% | 50.0% | -- | — |
| 2014 | PH PHO | 34 | 29 | 10.4 | 2.3 | 4.1 | 1.4 | 0.4 | 27.9% | 54.6% | -- | — |
| 2013 | PH PHO | 34 | 33 | 14.5 | 2.4 | 5.8 | 1.1 | 0.3 | 32.5% | 54.7% | -- | — |
| Career | 428 | 31 | 14.6 | 2.5 | 5.8 | 1.2 | 0.5 | 30.1% | 53.5% | -6.3 | +1.36 | |