SW
AT
ATL
2025 profile
GP
41
MIN
8.6
Data2025 statsVPM2026 prior
Shatori Walker-Kimbrough
A complete WNBA profile across scoring, role, on/off context, and VPM impact.
Production
PTS10
1.7
REB7
0.9
AST15
0.5
Two-Way
MIN11
8.6
STL8
0.2
BLK42
0.3
TOV7
0.4
Shooting
TS%45
52.2%
3P%67
35.5%
2P%45
46.9%
Impact
rTSvs lg
-1.9
VPMvs lg
+0.6
SW
2025 Shatori Walker-Kimbrough
Shot Profile
PTS1.7
TS%52.2%
rTS-1.9
Below Avg
FT
Above Avg
League Avg
VOL
1.6 FTA/100 (-3.1)
4.7 FTA/100
EFF
72.7% (-6.0%)
78.7% FT
RIM
League Avg
VOL
1.3 FGA/100 (-3.4)
4.7 FGA/100
EFF
55.6% (-7.4%)
63.0% FG
MID
League Avg
VOL
3.3 FGA/100 (-3.1)
6.4 FGA/100
EFF
43.5% (+3.7%)
39.8% FG
Below Avg
3P
Above Avg
League Avg
VOL
4.4 3PA/100 (-1.8)
6.2 3PA/100
EFF
35.5% (+1.7%)
33.8% FG
databallr
Volume is attempts per 100 offensive possessions. League volume is team attempts per 100 divided by 5.
Impact Breakdown
Where 2025 value comes from — points per 100 possessions vs. a league-average player. Green helps the team.
RAPM prior: 2026
Net Impact
+0.63
Offense
+0.44
Defense
+0.19
Sample
146 poss
Offense+0.44
Shot Makingfield-goal value
+0.23Rim+0.31Mid-0.363PT+0.27
Free Throwsdrawing & making FTs
+0.21Ball Securityavoiding turnovers
+0.25Second Chanceoffensive boards
-0.25Defense+0.19
Shot Defenseopponent FG suppression
+0.11Rim-0.07Mid+0.123PT+0.05
Foul Disciplinelimiting opponent FTs
+0.06Forcing TOscreating turnovers
+0.06Defensive Boardsdenying second shots
-0.03VPM factor split. Shot value (field-goal efficiency by zone) + free throws + ball security (turnovers) + second chance (rebounding). Channels sum to each side's total; offense plus defense equals net.
Career Progression
Shatori Walker-Kimbrough's points per game over time
Career Log
9 seasons| Profile | Production | Shooting | Impact | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Season | Team | GP | MIN | PTS | AST | REB | STL | BLK | 3P% | TS% | rTS | NET |
| 2025 | AT ATL | 41 | 9 | 1.7 | 0.5 | 0.9 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 35.5% | 52.2% | -- | — |
| 2024 |  WAS | 40 | 22 | 7.5 | 1.9 | 1.7 | 1.1 | 0.5 | 33.0% | 53.0% | -0.5 | — |
| 2023 | WAS | 40 | 25 | 6.3 | 1.6 | 2.0 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 39.0% | 55.6% | -12.3 | — |
| 2022 | WAS | 35 | 20 | 6.9 | 1.5 | 1.8 | 1.1 | 0.3 | 34.7% | 53.4% | +20.9 | — |
| 2021 | WAS | 17 | 20 | 6.9 | 0.9 | 1.4 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 32.0% | 63.4% | +10.5 | — |
| 2020 |  PHO | 21 | 19 | 7.3 | 1.5 | 1.6 | 1.1 | 0.4 | 43.1% | 55.8% | +11.1 | — |
| 2019 | WAS | 34 | 17 | 6.7 | 1.2 | 1.6 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 31.0% | 55.9% | +1.4 | — |
| 2018 | WAS | 19 | 9 | 3.5 | 0.4 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 30.4% | 54.0% | +46.4 | — |
| 2017 | WAS | 27 | 12 | 4.4 | 0.4 | 1.1 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 33.3% | 50.9% | -52.9 | — |
| Career | 274 | 17 | 5.6 | 1.2 | 1.5 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 35.0% | 54.4% | +0.5 | — | |