CW
MI
MIN
2026 profile
GP
36
MIN
30.6
Data2026 currentRAPM2026 modelOn/OffNo row
Courtney Williams
A complete WNBA profile across scoring, role, on/off context, and RAPM impact.
Production
PTS
14.6
REB
5.1
AST
4.2
Two-Way
MIN
30.6
STL
1.2
BLK
0.3
TOV
1.8
Shooting
TS%
51.4%
3P%
35.9%
2P%
48.4%
Impact
rTSvs lg
-0.1
RAPMvs lg
+1.8
CW
2026 Courtney Williams
Shot Profile
PTS14.6
TS%51.4%
rTS-0.1
Below Avg
FT
Above Avg
League Avg
VOL
2.2 FTA/100 (-3.1)
5.3 FTA/100
EFF
81.3% (+2.5%)
78.7% FT
RIM
League Avg
VOL
1.8 FGA/100 (-3.4)
5.2 FGA/100
EFF
53.8% (-10.5%)
64.4% FG
MID
League Avg
VOL
15.1 FGA/100 (+9.4)
5.6 FGA/100
EFF
47.7% (+7.4%)
40.3% FG
Below Avg
3P
Above Avg
League Avg
VOL
5.3 3PA/100 (-1.0)
6.3 3PA/100
EFF
35.9% (+1.7%)
34.2% FG
databallr
Volume is attempts per 100 offensive possessions. League volume is team attempts per 100 divided by 5.
Impact Breakdown
Where 2026 value comes from — points per 100 possessions vs. a league-average player. Green helps the team.
Net Impact
+1.83
Offense
+0.90
Defense
+0.94
Sample
33,030 poss
Offense+0.90
Shot Makingfield-goal value
+0.31Rim-0.09Mid-0.083PT+0.49
Free Throwsdrawing & making FTs
-0.75Ball Securityavoiding turnovers
+0.32Second Chanceoffensive boards
+1.01Defense+0.94
Shot Defenseopponent FG suppression
+0.54Rim+0.03Mid+0.243PT+0.26
Foul Disciplinelimiting opponent FTs
+0.22Forcing TOscreating turnovers
+0.07Defensive Boardsdenying second shots
+0.11Alt3 eFG split RAPM. Shot value (field-goal efficiency by zone) + free throws + ball security (turnovers) + second chance (rebounding). Channels sum to each side's total; offense plus defense equals net.
Career Progression
Courtney Williams's points per game over time
Career Log
11 seasons| Profile | Production | Shooting | Impact | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Season | Team | GP | MIN | PTS | AST | REB | STL | BLK | 3P% | TS% | rTS | NET |
| 2026 | MI MIN | 36 | 31 | 14.6 | 4.2 | 5.1 | 1.2 | 0.3 | 35.9% | 51.4% | -0.1 | +1.83 |
| 2025 | MI MIN | 44 | 29 | 13.6 | 6.2 | 4.9 | 1.3 | 0.3 | 38.9% | 49.6% | -5.5 | — |
| 2024 | MI MIN | 40 | 26 | 11.1 | 5.5 | 4.7 | 0.9 | 0.4 | 33.3% | 48.8% | -4.3 | — |
| 2023 |  CHI | 40 | 30 | 10.3 | 6.3 | 6.0 | 0.9 | 0.3 | 44.3% | 50.0% | -17.1 | — |
| 2022 |  CON | 34 | 28 | 11.1 | 3.3 | 4.6 | 1.0 | 0.4 | 33.8% | 46.9% | -9.5 | — |
| 2021 |  ATL | 32 | 34 | 16.5 | 4.0 | 6.8 | 1.1 | 0.5 | 38.2% | 46.5% | -6.6 | — |
| 2020 | ATL | 20 | 31 | 14.6 | 3.1 | 7.2 | 0.7 | 0.1 | 23.5% | 46.2% | -8.1 | — |
| 2019 | CON | 34 | 29 | 13.2 | 3.8 | 5.6 | 1.4 | 0.4 | 45.7% | 48.2% | -2.4 | — |
| 2018 | CON | 30 | 27 | 12.6 | 3.0 | 5.9 | 0.8 | 0.1 | 37.7% | 49.1% | +2.7 | — |
| 2017 | CON | 34 | 26 | 12.3 | 2.1 | 4.2 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 32.4% | 51.2% | -7.5 | — |
| 2016 | CON | 25 | 14 | 6.2 | 1.2 | 3.0 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 29.6% | 44.6% | -8.5 | — |
| Career | 369 | 28 | 12.4 | 4.1 | 5.2 | 0.9 | 0.3 | 37.2% | 48.7% | -6.2 | +1.83 | |