KC
PH
PHX
2025 profile
GP
28
MIN
26.9
Data2025 statsVPM2026 prior
Kahleah Copper
A complete WNBA profile across scoring, role, on/off context, and VPM impact.
Production
PTS91
15.6
REB51
2.9
AST46
1.5
Two-Way
MIN74
26.9
STL70
1.1
BLK27
0.2
TOV89
2.2
Shooting
TS%66
54.8%
3P%80
37.7%
2P%39
45.5%
Impact
rTSvs lg
+0.7
VPMvs lg
-1.3
KC
2025 Kahleah Copper
Shot Profile
PTS15.6
TS%54.8%
rTS+0.7
Below Avg
FT
Above Avg
League Avg
VOL
6.0 FTA/100 (+1.3)
4.7 FTA/100
EFF
85.2% (+6.5%)
78.7% FT
RIM
League Avg
VOL
6.9 FGA/100 (+2.2)
4.7 FGA/100
EFF
57.4% (-5.6%)
63.0% FG
MID
League Avg
VOL
7.5 FGA/100 (+1.1)
6.4 FGA/100
EFF
34.5% (-5.3%)
39.8% FG
Below Avg
3P
Above Avg
League Avg
VOL
10.3 3PA/100 (+4.1)
6.2 3PA/100
EFF
37.7% (+4.0%)
33.8% FG
databallr
Volume is attempts per 100 offensive possessions. League volume is team attempts per 100 divided by 5.
Impact Breakdown
Where 2025 value comes from — points per 100 possessions vs. a league-average player. Green helps the team.
RAPM prior: 2026
Net Impact
-1.28
Offense
-0.45
Defense
-0.83
Sample
5,163 poss
Offense-0.45
Shot Makingfield-goal value
-0.32Rim+0.65Mid-0.083PT-0.89
Free Throwsdrawing & making FTs
+0.69Ball Securityavoiding turnovers
+0.12Second Chanceoffensive boards
-0.95Defense-0.83
Shot Defenseopponent FG suppression
-0.37Rim-0.32Mid+0.143PT-0.19
Foul Disciplinelimiting opponent FTs
+0.11Forcing TOscreating turnovers
-0.57Defensive Boardsdenying second shots
+0.01VPM factor split. Shot value (field-goal efficiency by zone) + free throws + ball security (turnovers) + second chance (rebounding). Channels sum to each side's total; offense plus defense equals net.
Career Progression
Kahleah Copper's points per game over time
Career Log
10 seasons| Profile | Production | Shooting | Impact | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Season | Team | GP | MIN | PTS | AST | REB | STL | BLK | 3P% | TS% | rTS | NET |
| 2025 | PH PHX | 28 | 27 | 15.6 | 1.5 | 2.9 | 1.1 | 0.2 | 37.7% | 54.8% | +3.2 | — |
| 2024 | PH PHO | 36 | 32 | 21.2 | 2.2 | 4.6 | 0.8 | 0.1 | 31.8% | 54.3% | -3.4 | — |
| 2023 |  CHI | 38 | 31 | 18.7 | 2.0 | 4.4 | 0.9 | 0.3 | 40.4% | 54.8% | -1.4 | — |
| 2022 | CHI | 31 | 29 | 15.7 | 2.3 | 5.7 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 35.6% | 57.8% | +0.8 | — |
| 2021 | CHI | 32 | 31 | 14.4 | 1.8 | 4.2 | 0.9 | 0.3 | 30.6% | 54.0% | +8.9 | — |
| 2020 | CHI | 22 | 31 | 14.8 | 2.1 | 5.5 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 34.4% | 56.0% | -1.1 | — |
| 2019 | CHI | 34 | 15 | 6.7 | 0.9 | 1.9 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 30.6% | 48.1% | +23.6 | — |
| 2018 | CHI | 33 | 16 | 7.1 | 0.6 | 2.2 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 37.5% | 51.5% | -2.1 | — |
| 2017 | CHI | 34 | 14 | 6.7 | 0.4 | 1.9 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 29.4% | 54.8% | +1.9 | — |
| 2016 |  WAS | 30 | 16 | 6.2 | 0.8 | 3.1 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 46.7% | 50.5% | -2.6 | — |
| Career | 318 | 24 | 12.8 | 1.4 | 3.6 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 35.4% | 53.6% | +2.9 | — | |