RB
CH
CHI
2026 profile
GP
30
MIN
12.9
Data2026 currentRAPM2026 modelOn/OffNo row
Rachel Banham
A complete WNBA profile across scoring, role, on/off context, and RAPM impact.
Production
PTS
4.7
REB
1.1
AST
1.1
Two-Way
MIN
12.9
STL
0.3
BLK
0.3
TOV
0.8
Shooting
TS%
50.7%
3P%
32.7%
2P%
47.1%
Impact
rTSvs lg
+0.0
RAPMvs lg
-1.8
RB
CH
2026 Rachel Banham
Shot Profile
PTS4.7
TS%50.7%
rTS+0.0
Below Avg
FT
Above Avg
League Avg
VOL
2.0 FTA/100 (-3.2)
5.3 FTA/100
EFF
81.3% (+2.6%)
78.6% FT
RIM
League Avg
VOL
0.9 FGA/100 (-4.3)
5.2 FGA/100
EFF
57.1% (-7.4%)
64.5% FG
MID
League Avg
VOL
3.4 FGA/100 (-2.2)
5.6 FGA/100
EFF
44.4% (+4.0%)
40.4% FG
Below Avg
3P
Above Avg
League Avg
VOL
12.4 3PA/100 (+6.1)
6.3 3PA/100
EFF
32.7% (-1.7%)
34.3% FG
databallr
Volume is attempts per 100 offensive possessions. League volume is team attempts per 100 divided by 5.
Impact Breakdown
Where 2026 value comes from — points per 100 possessions vs. a league-average player. Green helps the team.
Net Impact
-1.75
Offense
-0.86
Defense
-0.89
Sample
6,786 poss
Offense-0.86
Shot Makingfield-goal value
-0.32Rim-0.05Mid-0.553PT+0.28
Free Throwsdrawing & making FTs
-0.18Ball Securityavoiding turnovers
-0.46Second Chanceoffensive boards
+0.11Defense-0.89
Shot Defenseopponent FG suppression
-0.62Rim-0.32Mid-0.263PT-0.04
Foul Disciplinelimiting opponent FTs
-0.02Forcing TOscreating turnovers
-0.50Defensive Boardsdenying second shots
+0.25Alt3 eFG split RAPM. Shot value (field-goal efficiency by zone) + free throws + ball security (turnovers) + second chance (rebounding). Channels sum to each side's total; offense plus defense equals net.
Career Progression
Rachel Banham's points per game over time
Career Log
11 seasons| Profile | Production | Shooting | Impact | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Season | Team | GP | MIN | PTS | AST | REB | STL | BLK | 3P% | TS% | rTS | NET |
| 2026 | CH CHI | 30 | 13 | 4.7 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 32.7% | 50.7% | +0.0 | -1.75 |
| 2025 | CH CHI | 44 | 25 | 9.0 | 2.7 | 1.7 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 35.7% | 53.2% | -0.7 | — |
| 2024 | CH CHI | 37 | 16 | 5.7 | 1.1 | 1.4 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 36.6% | 49.3% | -4.1 | — |
| 2023 |  MIN | 32 | 14 | 5.5 | 1.7 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 40.2% | 51.8% | -14.5 | — |
| 2022 | MIN | 36 | 18 | 7.9 | 2.3 | 1.3 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 38.3% | 57.1% | +3.1 | — |
| 2021 | MIN | 27 | 13 | 5.0 | 1.6 | 1.2 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 37.3% | 50.8% | -19.7 | — |
| 2020 | MIN | 20 | 17 | 6.8 | 2.4 | 1.3 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 47.2% | 60.6% | -14.6 | — |
| 2019 |  CON | 29 | 12 | 3.6 | 0.9 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 30.6% | 43.0% | +9.7 | — |
| 2018 | CON | 33 | 13 | 5.2 | 1.5 | 0.9 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 37.0% | 57.0% | -16.1 | — |
| 2017 | CON | 30 | 9 | 3.3 | 0.7 | 1.1 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 28.1% | 44.5% | +97.1 | — |
| 2016 | CON | 15 | 11 | 3.7 | 0.9 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 35.1% | 55.0% | +1.1 | — |
| Career | 333 | 15 | 5.7 | 1.6 | 1.2 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 36.3% | 51.9% | +4.0 | -1.75 | |