Khaman Maluach - NBA Draft Profile
Khaman Maluach
NBA Draft Profile

Khaman Maluach
Prospect Rank

Khaman Maluach
Prospect Rank
Offensive Impact
2025 - Khaman Maluach
Defensive Impact
2025 - Khaman Maluach
Khaman Maluach Season Stats (via cbbdata)
Offensive Stats
| Year | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
'25 Fr Duke | 5.8 76 | 21.5 9 | 16.8% 7 | 73.6% 98 | 4.3% 20 | 10.5% 82 | 40.3% 17 |
Shooting Stats (per 100 poss)
| Year | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
'25 Fr Duke | 11.7 73 | 76.9% 80 | 1.4 1 | 63.2% 100 | 1.2 91 | 25.0% 79 | 5.8 10 | 76.6% 92 |
Defensive Stats
| Year | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
'25 Fr Duke | 2.9 48 | 0.6 8 | 6.8 41 | 16.5% 90 | 19.2% 41 | 3.9% 47 |
5-Game Rolling Average
Showing Usage Rate and TS% over time
Khaman Maluach Stats Per Game vs Top 50 Opponents ()
Counting Stats
Counting Stats
Advanced Stats
Khaman Maluach Shot Map
Khaman Maluach Hoop-Explorer RAPM
Khaman Maluach Shot Type Analysis
Khaman Maluach HalfCourt Stats
Shot Type Breakdown
Khaman Maluach's Shooting Stats
High School (850 minutes)
NCAA (804 minutes)
Khaman Maluach On/Off Impact
| Metric | On | Off | On-Off |
|---|---|---|---|
| Adj ORTG | 135.2100 | 130.399 | +4.869 |
| EFG% | 58.4%99 | 57.4%97 | +1.0%52 |
| TOV% | 13.6%97 | 14.9%89 | -1.3%63 |
| ORB% | 34.9%91 | 32.7%75 | +2.3%75 |
| FTR | 32.1%44 | 33.7%59 | -1.6%38 |
| RIM FREQ | 40.4%73 | 35.7%40 | +4.6%86 |
| RIM ACC | 62.9%89 | 63.7%91 | -0.8%39 |
NBA Draft Comps
Historical player comparisons based on cosine similarity
| College Stats(relative to K. Maluach) | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | Sim | BPM | OBPM | DBPM | Load | USG | AST | TS% | STL | BLK | OREB% | DREB% |
| 100% PkPick UD | 8.7 | 5.8 | 2.9 | 21.5 | 16.8% | 4.3 | 73.6% | 0.6 | 6.8 | 16.5 | 19.2 | |
| 93% PkPick 42 | -2.2 | -1.3 | -1.0 | 7.2 | 5.3% | 3.8 | -3.2% | 0.6 | -2.7 | -5.3 | -0.2 | |
| 92% PkPick 35 | -1.2 | -1.5 | 0.3 | 5.0 | 3.6% | 2.3 | -10.0% | 0.5 | -2.7 | -5.3 | 2.2 | |
| 91% PkPick 8 | 0.3 | -1.9 | 2.2 | -0.7 | 0.1% | -1.7 | 0.3% | 0.9 | 3.8 | -7.7 | -3.0 | |
| 91% PkPick 15 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 0.5 | 5.6 | 4.3% | 5.2 | -8.8% | 1.5 | 2.8 | -2.1 | 0.8 | |
| 90% PkPick UD | -2.8 | -1.7 | -1.2 | 3.4 | 5.1% | -0.8 | -11.5% | 0.8 | 0.3 | -2.1 | -2.9 | |
| 89% PkPick 16 | -1.1 | -2.2 | 1.1 | 8.1 | 4.3% | 4.3 | -6.1% | 1.3 | -0.9 | -8.8 | -0.3 | |
| 89% PkPick 28 | -1.9 | -0.8 | -1.1 | 6.3 | 4.6% | 3.1 | -15.4% | 0.4 | -2.2 | 1.7 | -0.2 | |
| 89% PkPick UD | -0.6 | -0.2 | -0.4 | 9.2 | 5.3% | 5.6 | -11.3% | 0.5 | -0.3 | -8.5 | 6.9 | |
| 89% PkPick 14 | -1.8 | -2.0 | 0.2 | 1.6 | 2.4% | 0.4 | -11.2% | 0.6 | -1.9 | -5.3 | -2.0 | |
| 89% PkPick 53 | -3.6 | -3.0 | -0.6 | 6.7 | 5.5% | 0.8 | -6.3% | 0.9 | 1.9 | -5.5 | 5.4 | |
| 87% PkPick 27 | -3.1 | -2.2 | -0.9 | 7.5 | 4.9% | 5.6 | -12.9% | 1.1 | -1.1 | -2.7 | -1.7 | |
| 87% PkPick 15 | 3.4 | 2.0 | 1.4 | 3.6 | 1.8% | 2.6 | -1.2% | 0.7 | 4.5 | -3.3 | 2.2 | |
| 87% PkPick 3 | -1.2 | -2.0 | 0.8 | 6.7 | 5.0% | 3.0 | -11.3% | 1.2 | 1.0 | -4.0 | 1.0 | |
| 87% PkPick 11 | -2.4 | -2.8 | 0.4 | 7.0 | 5.2% | 5.6 | -11.8% | 0.3 | 0.1 | -7.4 | 4.3 | |
| 86% PkPick 31 | -1.9 | -2.9 | 1.0 | 3.3 | 1.7% | 3.2 | -13.5% | 0.2 | 3.4 | -2.9 | -0.2 | |
| 86% PkPick 33 | 0.7 | -1.0 | 1.8 | 5.5 | 3.8% | 5.5 | -7.5% | 1.0 | 3.5 | -4.3 | -1.2 | |
| 86% PkPick 18 | -1.1 | 0.1 | -1.3 | 9.3 | 4.7% | 8.9 | -7.6% | 0.5 | -3.3 | -7.4 | 0.5 | |
| 86% PkPick 17 | -1.7 | -0.9 | -0.8 | 1.7 | 1.3% | 4.2 | -10.8% | 0.4 | -1.6 | -9.8 | -2.9 | |
| 86% PkPick UD | -3.3 | -2.7 | -0.6 | 15.9 | 11.8% | 1.6 | -10.4% | 0.0 | 2.8 | -2.7 | 2.2 | |
Film Cuts By Cashiggy
Videos via YouTubeProjected NBA Role
Raw tools-first center with elite size and lob-finishing ability, but major questions about feel, hands, and role scalability on both ends
Swing Skill
Offensive Processing: Extremely limited passer with low assist rate and slow decision-making; Hands and Coordination: Needs drastic improvement in catching in traffic and finishing through contact; Defensive Consistency: Inconsistent impact despite elite tools, must improve discipline, angles, and rebounding effort; Shooting: Theoretical stretch potential exists, but mechanics and confidence aren’t there yet
NBA Player Comparisons
Mitchell Robinson: high-level vertical athlete and interior defender with strong rim gravity and mobility if instincts and motor catch up to tools
Bismack Biyombo: mobile shot blocker and lob threat who carves out a long career as a backup despite raw skillset
Bruno Fernando: physical, mobile big with flashes of rim protection, but limited feel and offensive utility restrict long-term impact
Detailed Analysis
Analysis by ReverseEnigma


