NH
MI
MIN
2025 profile
GP
44
MIN
19.0
Data2025 statsVPM2026 prior
Natisha Hiedeman
A complete WNBA profile across scoring, role, on/off context, and VPM impact.
Production
PTS65
9.1
REB32
1.9
AST75
2.8
Two-Way
MIN49
19.0
STL52
0.7
BLK35
0.2
TOV55
1.2
Shooting
TS%84
59.4%
3P%78
37.1%
2P%91
57.7%
Impact
rTSvs lg
+5.3
VPMvs lg
+2.0
NH
2025 Natisha Hiedeman
Shot Profile
PTS9.1
TS%59.4%
rTS+5.3
Below Avg
FT
Above Avg
League Avg
VOL
4.1 FTA/100 (-0.5)
4.7 FTA/100
EFF
76.1% (-2.6%)
78.7% FT
RIM
League Avg
VOL
6.3 FGA/100 (+1.7)
4.7 FGA/100
EFF
74.8% (+11.8%)
63.0% FG
MID
League Avg
VOL
4.9 FGA/100 (-1.5)
6.4 FGA/100
EFF
35.4% (-4.4%)
39.8% FG
Below Avg
3P
Above Avg
League Avg
VOL
7.6 3PA/100 (+1.4)
6.2 3PA/100
EFF
37.1% (+3.3%)
33.8% FG
databallr
Volume is attempts per 100 offensive possessions. League volume is team attempts per 100 divided by 5.
Impact Breakdown
Where 2025 value comes from — points per 100 possessions vs. a league-average player. Green helps the team.
RAPM prior: 2026
Net Impact
+1.99
Offense
+2.00
Defense
-0.01
Sample
4,478 poss
Offense+2.00
Shot Makingfield-goal value
+1.18Rim+0.41Mid+0.793PT-0.02
Free Throwsdrawing & making FTs
+0.14Ball Securityavoiding turnovers
+0.81Second Chanceoffensive boards
-0.12Defense-0.01
Shot Defenseopponent FG suppression
+0.26Rim-0.27Mid+0.323PT+0.21
Foul Disciplinelimiting opponent FTs
-0.03Forcing TOscreating turnovers
-0.17Defensive Boardsdenying second shots
-0.09VPM factor split. Shot value (field-goal efficiency by zone) + free throws + ball security (turnovers) + second chance (rebounding). Channels sum to each side's total; offense plus defense equals net.
Career Progression
Natisha Hiedeman's points per game over time
Career Log
7 seasons| Profile | Production | Shooting | Impact | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Season | Team | GP | MIN | PTS | AST | REB | STL | BLK | 3P% | TS% | rTS | NET |
| 2025 | MI MIN | 44 | 19 | 9.1 | 2.8 | 1.9 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 37.1% | 59.4% | -8.0 | — |
| 2024 | MI MIN | 40 | 15 | 4.8 | 2.4 | 1.6 | 0.8 | 0.1 | 28.0% | 47.1% | +2.3 | — |
| 2023 |  CON | 40 | 27 | 8.5 | 2.6 | 2.1 | 0.9 | 0.1 | 36.6% | 50.8% | -12.7 | — |
| 2022 | CON | 36 | 25 | 9.1 | 3.3 | 1.8 | 1.2 | 0.1 | 41.1% | 57.5% | -0.8 | — |
| 2021 | CON | 32 | 20 | 7.6 | 1.9 | 1.8 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 39.8% | 55.8% | +19.0 | — |
| 2020 | CON | 22 | 19 | 6.1 | 1.9 | 1.9 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 35.9% | 47.9% | +19.1 | — |
| 2019 | CON | 20 | 10 | 3.6 | 1.9 | 1.5 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 46.4% | 53.7% | +30.4 | — |
| Career | 234 | 20 | 7.3 | 2.5 | 1.8 | 0.8 | 0.1 | 37.6% | 53.5% | +3.6 | — | |