AS
CH
CHI
2026 profile
GP
20
MIN
24.7
Data2026 currentRAPM2026 modelOn/OffNo row
Azura Stevens
A complete WNBA profile across scoring, role, on/off context, and RAPM impact.
Production
PTS
10.8
REB
6.5
AST
2.3
Two-Way
MIN
24.7
STL
0.8
BLK
0.3
TOV
1.6
Shooting
TS%
51.2%
3P%
28.2%
2P%
47.2%
Impact
rTSvs lg
-4.5
RAPMvs lg
-1.4
AS
CH
2026 Azura Stevens
Shot Profile
PTS10.8
TS%51.2%
rTS-4.5
Below Avg
FT
Above Avg
League Avg
VOL
4.9 FTA/100 (-0.4)
5.3 FTA/100
EFF
82.6% (+4.2%)
78.5% FT
RIM
League Avg
VOL
8.7 FGA/100 (+3.5)
5.2 FGA/100
EFF
57.3% (-6.6%)
63.9% FG
MID
League Avg
VOL
4.6 FGA/100 (-1.0)
5.6 FGA/100
EFF
27.9% (-12.4%)
40.3% FG
Below Avg
3P
Above Avg
League Avg
VOL
7.5 3PA/100 (+1.3)
6.3 3PA/100
EFF
28.2% (-5.4%)
33.6% FG
databallr
Volume is attempts per 100 offensive possessions. League volume is team attempts per 100 divided by 5.
Impact Breakdown
Where 2026 value comes from — points per 100 possessions vs. a league-average player. Green helps the team.
Net Impact
-1.44
Offense
-0.86
Defense
-0.58
Sample
18,128 poss
Offense-0.86
Shot Makingfield-goal value
-0.05Rim+0.49Mid-0.483PT-0.06
Free Throwsdrawing & making FTs
-0.15Ball Securityavoiding turnovers
-0.01Second Chanceoffensive boards
-0.64Defense-0.58
Shot Defenseopponent FG suppression
-0.41Rim-0.04Mid-0.323PT-0.04
Foul Disciplinelimiting opponent FTs
+0.05Forcing TOscreating turnovers
+0.12Defensive Boardsdenying second shots
-0.35Alt3 eFG split RAPM. Shot value (field-goal efficiency by zone) + free throws + ball security (turnovers) + second chance (rebounding). Channels sum to each side's total; offense plus defense equals net.
Career Progression
Azura Stevens's points per game over time
Career Log
9 seasons| Profile | Production | Shooting | Impact | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Season | Team | GP | MIN | PTS | AST | REB | STL | BLK | 3P% | TS% | rTS | NET |
| 2026 | CH CHI | 20 | 25 | 10.8 | 2.3 | 6.5 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 28.2% | 51.2% | -4.5 | -1.44 |
| 2025 |  LAS | 44 | 28 | 12.8 | 2.1 | 8.0 | 1.2 | 1.1 | 38.1% | 59.6% | -- | — |
| 2024 | LAS | 20 | 24 | 9.6 | 1.9 | 7.0 | 0.8 | 0.9 | 35.0% | 50.8% | -- | — |
| 2023 | LAS | 35 | 26 | 10.8 | 1.1 | 5.9 | 1.2 | 0.9 | 32.1% | 47.9% | -- | — |
| 2022 | CH CHI | 35 | 22 | 10.6 | 0.8 | 3.9 | 0.5 | 1.1 | 36.2% | 55.5% | -- | — |
| 2021 | CH CHI | 30 | 19 | 7.4 | 0.8 | 4.6 | 0.8 | 0.7 | 33.3% | 57.3% | -- | — |
| 2020 | CH CHI | 13 | 27 | 11.5 | 1.5 | 5.9 | 0.9 | 1.8 | 38.5% | 59.5% | -- | — |
| 2019 |  DAL | 9 | 16 | 4.8 | 0.6 | 3.6 | 0.6 | 1.1 | 11.1% | 39.1% | -- | — |
| 2018 | DAL | 34 | 21 | 8.9 | 1.3 | 4.6 | 0.9 | 1.1 | 31.8% | 52.4% | -- | — |
| Career | 240 | 24 | 10.1 | 1.4 | 5.7 | 0.9 | 1.0 | 34.4% | 53.8% | -4.5 | -1.44 | |