RB
CH
CHI
2025 profile
GP
44
MIN
24.6
Data2025 statsVPM2026 prior
Rachel Banham
A complete WNBA profile across scoring, role, on/off context, and VPM impact.
Production
PTS64
9.0
REB24
1.7
AST73
2.7
Two-Way
MIN65
24.6
STL42
0.6
BLK41
0.3
TOV69
1.6
Shooting
TS%51
53.2%
3P%69
35.7%
2P%31
44.3%
Impact
rTSvs lg
-0.7
VPMvs lg
-3.6
RB
2025 Rachel Banham
Shot Profile
PTS9.0
TS%53.2%
rTS-0.7
Below Avg
FT
Above Avg
League Avg
VOL
2.8 FTA/100 (-1.8)
4.7 FTA/100
EFF
88.1% (+9.4%)
78.7% FT
RIM
League Avg
VOL
0.9 FGA/100 (-3.7)
4.7 FGA/100
EFF
47.4% (-15.6%)
63.0% FG
MID
League Avg
VOL
3.8 FGA/100 (-2.6)
6.4 FGA/100
EFF
43.6% (+3.8%)
39.8% FG
Below Avg
3P
Above Avg
League Avg
VOL
11.6 3PA/100 (+5.4)
6.2 3PA/100
EFF
35.7% (+1.9%)
33.8% FG
databallr
Volume is attempts per 100 offensive possessions. League volume is team attempts per 100 divided by 5.
Impact Breakdown
Where 2025 value comes from — points per 100 possessions vs. a league-average player. Green helps the team.
RAPM prior: 2026
Net Impact
-3.60
Offense
-2.87
Defense
-0.73
Sample
2,223 poss
Offense-2.87
Shot Makingfield-goal value
-1.47Rim-0.39Mid-0.023PT-1.05
Free Throwsdrawing & making FTs
-0.40Ball Securityavoiding turnovers
+0.03Second Chanceoffensive boards
-1.04Defense-0.73
Shot Defenseopponent FG suppression
-0.14Rim-0.09Mid-0.013PT-0.03
Foul Disciplinelimiting opponent FTs
-0.00Forcing TOscreating turnovers
-0.48Defensive Boardsdenying second shots
-0.12VPM factor split. Shot value (field-goal efficiency by zone) + free throws + ball security (turnovers) + second chance (rebounding). Channels sum to each side's total; offense plus defense equals net.
Career Progression
Rachel Banham's points per game over time
Career Log
10 seasons| Profile | Production | Shooting | Impact | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Season | Team | GP | MIN | PTS | AST | REB | STL | BLK | 3P% | TS% | rTS | NET |
| 2025 | CH CHI | 44 | 25 | 9.0 | 2.7 | 1.7 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 35.7% | 53.2% | -0.7 | — |
| 2024 | CH CHI | 37 | 16 | 5.7 | 1.1 | 1.4 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 36.6% | 49.3% | -4.1 | — |
| 2023 |  MIN | 32 | 14 | 5.5 | 1.7 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 40.2% | 51.8% | -14.5 | — |
| 2022 | MIN | 36 | 18 | 7.9 | 2.3 | 1.3 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 38.3% | 57.1% | +3.1 | — |
| 2021 | MIN | 27 | 13 | 5.0 | 1.6 | 1.2 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 37.3% | 50.8% | -19.7 | — |
| 2020 | MIN | 20 | 17 | 6.8 | 2.4 | 1.3 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 47.2% | 60.6% | -14.6 | — |
| 2019 |  CON | 29 | 12 | 3.6 | 0.9 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 30.6% | 43.0% | +9.7 | — |
| 2018 | CON | 33 | 13 | 5.2 | 1.5 | 0.9 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 37.0% | 57.0% | -16.1 | — |
| 2017 | CON | 30 | 9 | 3.3 | 0.7 | 1.1 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 28.1% | 44.5% | +97.1 | — |
| 2016 | CON | 15 | 11 | 3.7 | 0.9 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 35.1% | 55.0% | +1.1 | — |
| Career | 303 | 15 | 5.8 | 1.6 | 1.2 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 36.7% | 52.0% | +4.4 | — | |