Thomas Sorber - NBA Draft Profile
Thomas Sorber
NBA Draft Profile

Thomas Sorber
Prospect Rank

Thomas Sorber
Prospect Rank
Offensive Impact
2025 - Thomas Sorber
Defensive Impact
2025 - Thomas Sorber
Thomas Sorber Season Stats (via cbbdata)
Offensive Stats
Year | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
'25 Fr Georgetown | 3.3 32 | 32.9 42 | 24.2% 52 | 58.0% 58 | 15.6% 59 | 12.7% 30 | 42.0% 62 |
Shooting Stats (per 100 poss)
Year | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
'25 Fr Georgetown | 11.6 92 | 68.7% 69 | 4.9 32 | 38.1% 50 | 2.9 24 | 16.2% 14 | 8.1 55 | 72.4% 41 |
Defensive Stats
Year | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
'25 Fr Georgetown | 4.0 88 | 2.7 74 | 7.6 91 | 9.5% 76 | 21.9% 85 | 2.8% 51 |
5-Game Rolling Average
Showing Usage Rate and TS% over time
Thomas Sorber Stats Per Game vs Top 50 Opponents ()
Counting Stats
Counting Stats
Advanced Stats
Thomas Sorber Shot Map
Thomas Sorber Hoop-Explorer RAPM
Thomas Sorber Shot Type Analysis
Thomas Sorber HalfCourt Stats
Shot Type Breakdown
Thomas Sorber's Shooting Stats
High School (2938 minutes)
NCAA (736 minutes)
Thomas Sorber On/Off Impact
Metric | On | Off | On-Off |
---|---|---|---|
Adj ORTG | 108.856 | 109.668 | -0.832 |
EFG% | 51.4%57 | 49.1%38 | +2.3%70 |
TOV% | 19.9%11 | 13.8%96 | +6.1%0 |
ORB% | 34.7%89 | 27.6%34 | +7.1%97 |
FTR | 25.9%7 | 25.2%9 | +0.7%53 |
RIM FREQ | 41.8%83 | 32.8%20 | +9.0%98 |
RIM ACC | 63.2%90 | 54.2%28 | +9.0%96 |
NBA Draft Comps
Historical player comparisons based on cosine similarity
College Stats(relative to T. Sorber) | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Player | Sim | BPM | OBPM | DBPM | Load | USG | AST | TS% | STL | BLK | OREB% | DREB% |
100% PkPick UD | 7.3 | 3.3 | 4.0 | 32.9 | 24.2% | 15.6 | 58.0% | 2.7 | 7.6 | 9.5 | 21.9 | |
93% PkPick 22 | 2.7 | 1.9 | 0.8 | -2.3 | -1.4% | -8.3 | -0.0% | 0.6 | 3.1 | 8.9 | -0.9 | |
92% PkPick 3 | 0.2 | 0.5 | -0.3 | -4.8 | -2.4% | -8.3 | 4.3% | -0.9 | 0.2 | 3.0 | -1.7 | |
92% PkPick 15 | 1.6 | 2.3 | -0.6 | -5.9 | -3.1% | -6.1 | 6.8% | -0.6 | 2.0 | 4.9 | -1.9 | |
91% PkPick 5 | 2.3 | 2.9 | -0.6 | 8.4 | 6.6% | -6.4 | -0.1% | -0.3 | -0.1 | 10.4 | 3.0 | |
91% PkPick UD | 3.5 | 1.9 | 1.6 | -1.5 | 0.4% | -8.1 | 5.3% | -0.9 | 6.8 | 10.5 | 7.7 | |
91% PkPick 9 | -1.2 | -0.6 | -0.7 | -5.8 | -2.7% | -10.7 | 2.4% | -0.8 | -2.2 | 1.3 | 5.4 | |
91% PkPick 6 | 2.5 | 1.2 | 1.3 | -7.1 | -2.7% | -12.0 | 1.2% | -1.2 | 5.3 | 2.7 | 6.3 | |
90% PkPick 22 | -0.3 | 1.2 | -1.5 | -4.2 | -2.9% | -4.6 | -1.8% | -0.6 | -1.7 | 0.7 | -5.1 | |
90% PkPick 39 | -1.9 | -1.7 | -0.2 | -2.3 | -1.7% | -3.5 | 3.0% | -1.3 | 2.9 | 1.6 | 3.6 | |
90% PkPick UD | 0.5 | 0.9 | -0.3 | 2.1 | 2.7% | -4.0 | 1.1% | -0.7 | -3.8 | -0.5 | 2.6 | |
89% PkPick UD | -0.9 | -0.1 | -0.7 | -3.9 | -2.4% | -8.8 | -4.7% | -1.3 | 1.2 | -2.2 | -0.2 | |
89% PkPick 8 | 0.4 | 0.7 | -0.3 | -0.2 | -2.2% | -3.2 | -4.7% | -0.5 | -1.4 | 0.0 | -3.8 | |
89% PkPick 18 | -0.2 | 0.6 | -0.8 | 5.4 | 3.6% | -5.3 | -6.9% | -0.5 | -1.6 | -0.5 | 0.2 | |
89% PkPick 27 | -1.7 | 0.4 | -2.0 | -3.9 | -2.5% | -5.7 | 2.7% | -1.0 | -1.9 | 4.3 | -4.4 | |
88% PkPick 37 | 1.4 | 1.1 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 0.3% | -3.6 | 5.8% | -0.9 | 3.2 | 0.2 | 7.8 | |
88% PkPick 12 | -0.2 | 0.1 | -0.3 | -8.7 | -6.2% | -10.2 | -2.6% | -0.8 | 3.6 | 5.8 | -2.8 | |
87% PkPick 34 | -3.1 | -1.9 | -1.2 | -2.3 | -1.1% | -8.7 | 3.6% | -1.7 | -1.6 | -0.6 | 2.8 | |
87% PkPick 57 | 1.5 | 2.2 | -0.7 | -4.4 | -2.5% | -7.1 | 2.0% | -1.3 | -0.3 | 2.3 | -0.9 | |
86% PkPick 16 | 0.2 | 0.3 | -0.1 | -3.3 | -3.1% | -7.0 | 9.4% | -0.8 | -1.7 | -1.8 | -3.0 |
Film Cuts By Cashiggy
Videos via YouTubeProjected NBA Role
High-feel, ground-bound big who thrives as a post scorer, passer, and interior anchor. Projects as a drop-coverage center and short-roll hub with rare poise and processing for his age. Elite defensive positioning, event generation, and touch give him a high floor, while shooting and mobility development could unlock long-term starter value. Less scheme-versatile than other bigs, but offers plug-and-play utility in traditional center roles.
Swing Skill
Pick-and-Roll Finishing: Needs better vertical pop and explosiveness to convert at higher rates as a roll man; Jumper Development: Stretch potential hinges on becoming a reliable pick-and-pop threat; Lateral Mobility: Must improve agility and conditioning to stay on the floor in space-heavy matchups
NBA Player Comparisons
Al Horford: versatile two-way big who anchors defenses, spaces the floor, and connects offenses through smart decisions and passing
Derrick Favors-strong positional defender who protects the rim, rebounds, and passes well in structured sets, but isn’t a lob threat.
Daniel Theis: below-the-rim big with sound defense, good passing instincts, and limited spacing but reliable team value.
Detailed Analysis
Analysis by ReverseEnigma