Jase Richardson - NBA Draft Profile
Jase Richardson
NBA Draft Profile

Jase Richardson
Prospect Rank

Jase Richardson
Prospect Rank
Offensive Stats
| Year | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
'25 Fr Michigan St. | 5.8 74 | 30.3 22 | 19.4% 24 | 62.4% 88 | 14.4% 29 | 6.3% 96 | 41.8% 68 |
Shooting Stats (per 100 poss)
| Year | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
'25 Fr Michigan St. | 5.5 51 | 69.0% 88 | 5.8 53 | 40.7% 71 | 7.2 37 | 41.2% 85 | 7.7 54 | 83.6% 78 |
Defensive Stats
| Year | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
'25 Fr Michigan St. | 4.3 98 | 1.9 39 | 1.4 82 | 3.0% 62 | 11.4% 52 | 2.4% 51 |
Jase Richardson Shot Map
Jase Richardson HalfCourt Stats
Shot Type Breakdown
High School (1915 minutes)
NCAA (896 minutes)
| Metric | On | Off | On-Off |
|---|---|---|---|
| Adj ORTG | 123.094 | 117.087 | +6.074 |
| EFG% | 51.2%54 | 50.4%52 | +0.8%51 |
| TOV% | 15.8%76 | 18.1%44 | -2.3%78 |
| ORB% | 34.8%90 | 35.3%90 | -0.5%46 |
| FTR | 38.4%86 | 36.7%76 | +1.7%59 |
| RIM FREQ | 37.5%49 | 39.5%70 | -2.0%26 |
| RIM ACC | 63.5%92 | 65.9%97 | -2.3%26 |
Historical player comparisons based on cosine similarity
| College Stats(relative to J. Richardson) | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | Sim | BPM | OBPM | DBPM | Load | USG | AST | TS% | STL | BLK | OREB% | DREB% |
| 100% PkPick UD | 10.0 | 5.8 | 4.3 | 30.3 | 19.4% | 14.4 | 62.4% | 1.9 | 1.4 | 3.0 | 11.4 | |
| 92% PkPick 26 | -1.8 | 0.2 | -1.9 | 0.5 | -1.0% | 7.8 | 0.9% | -0.5 | -0.5 | -0.7 | -2.6 | |
| 91% PkPick 7 | -0.5 | 0.8 | -1.4 | 1.7 | 2.6% | -1.8 | 0.8% | -0.1 | 0.8 | 2.0 | 0.9 | |
| 90% PkPick 13 | -2.0 | -1.2 | -0.8 | 0.6 | 0.6% | 0.8 | -4.4% | 0.1 | -0.3 | -1.4 | 2.6 | |
| 90% PkPick 19 | -2.3 | -0.8 | -1.6 | -0.6 | 1.0% | -4.9 | -3.7% | 0.9 | -0.7 | 0.7 | -5.1 | |
| 89% PkPick 24 | -1.6 | -0.2 | -1.5 | 4.1 | 0.5% | 13.1 | -4.9% | 0.8 | -1.2 | -1.2 | -1.5 | |
| 88% PkPick UD | -2.1 | -1.2 | -0.9 | -4.6 | -3.9% | 1.7 | 1.6% | -0.1 | 1.6 | -0.1 | 1.8 | |
| 88% PkPick UD | -2.5 | -0.2 | -2.2 | -1.4 | 0.3% | -3.7 | -1.3% | 0.1 | -1.1 | 0.0 | 3.9 | |
| 87% PkPick 55 | -3.1 | -1.4 | -1.7 | 3.3 | 1.3% | 0.8 | -4.7% | -0.5 | -1.2 | -2.0 | -1.0 | |
| 86% PkPick 3 | -2.5 | -0.5 | -2.0 | 2.6 | 3.0% | -1.7 | -5.0% | 0.6 | 1.2 | 1.8 | 6.7 | |
| 86% PkPick UD | -0.6 | 0.7 | -1.3 | 2.2 | 1.5% | 1.3 | 1.7% | 0.1 | -0.8 | 1.3 | -1.1 | |
| 86% PkPick UD | -2.8 | -1.7 | -1.0 | 4.4 | 2.0% | 10.5 | -7.5% | 1.0 | -0.2 | 0.8 | -2.1 | |
| 85% PkPick 28 | -3.7 | -2.6 | -1.1 | 2.0 | 3.8% | -5.4 | -4.9% | 0.6 | 0.0 | -2.2 | 1.4 | |
| 84% PkPick 13 | -1.8 | 0.1 | -2.0 | 1.9 | 1.1% | -3.5 | -2.4% | -0.6 | -1.1 | -0.4 | -3.6 | |
| 84% PkPick UD | 0.8 | 0.7 | 0.1 | 2.0 | -0.7% | 9.6 | 7.5% | 2.7 | 1.1 | -1.5 | 1.9 | |
| 84% PkPick 1 | 3.8 | 3.7 | 0.1 | 16.1 | 7.8% | 15.4 | 7.3% | 1.1 | 0.4 | -0.7 | -0.8 | |
| 83% PkPick 11 | -2.2 | 0.3 | -2.4 | 8.2 | 5.7% | -1.1 | -3.8% | -0.3 | 0.1 | -1.9 | -4.2 | |
| 82% PkPick 2 | 0.9 | 1.8 | -0.8 | 5.6 | 0.7% | 17.0 | 4.8% | 0.9 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 2.9 | |
| 82% PkPick 12 | -2.6 | -0.6 | -2.0 | -0.6 | -0.1% | -2.1 | -5.6% | 0.0 | 0.8 | 2.0 | 0.8 | |
| 82% PkPick 29 | -4.5 | -3.3 | -1.2 | -2.3 | -2.6% | 2.9 | -9.9% | 0.0 | -0.5 | -0.8 | -1.9 | |
Projected NBA Role
Polished, efficient combo guard who excels in structured systems as a low-mistake, high-IQ connector; projects as a floor-spacing secondary ball-handler who thrives off movement and in second-side actions. While unlikely to be a full-time lead guard, he can elevate bench units or complement primary creators in dual-guard lineups, with starter equity if his handle, ambidexterity, and playmaking evolve.
Swing Skill
Handle and Right-Hand Development: Currently too left-hand dominant, must improve ambidexterity and dribble craft to create vs pressure; Scalability and Playmaking: Needs to grow as a manipulative passer and expand pick-and-roll reads; Point-of-Attack Defense: Undersized and lacks screen navigation tools, must improve strength and technique to stay playable against guards
NBA Player Comparisons
A smaller Malcolm Brogdon: poised combo guard with shooting touch and positional IQ, who could start if passing and handle scale up
Better Shooting Tyus Jones: efficient, mistake-free backup who thrives as a low-usage connector with touch and control
Jared Harper: undersized scoring guard with touch and quickness, but limited defensive versatility and creation ceiling
Detailed Analysis
Analysis by ReverseEnigma


